I W Boson and different generations of quarks

Richard McCarthy
Can a W Boson convert an up quark into a down quark of the same generation? Where can I find a resource to understand what all the possibilities are for an up quark converting into other quarks of same or other generations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first generation of quarks is "up-quarks and down-quarks" by definition, up and down are always in the same generation. The second generation is charm and strange and the third one is top and bottom.
Richard McCarthy said:
Where can I find a resource to understand what all the possibilities are for an up quark converting into other quarks of same or other generations?
Coupling to the W is the only option, and while the coupling with an up-quark to a down is the strongest one, coupling to strange and bottom is also possible.
If the W is not real (e.g. in a beta decay), conservation of energy can make some processes impossible.
 
By looking at the CKM matrix you can immediately see that the transitions between up and down-type quarks are all possible in principle (yet not equally favored)...So for example you could see the transition t \rightarrow b, but you would rarely see t \rightarrow s... yet again you could see a c \rightarrow s but it's also possible (not extremely rare) to see c \rightarrow d. In general I think the CKM matrix tells you that transitions are more likely to occur within the same generation rather than the other...
The transitions happen via the W bosons (or charged currents), since there are no flavor changing neutral currents observed.
 
Richard McCarthy said:
Can a W Boson convert an up quark into a down quark of the same generation?

I understand that by up and down quark you mean up type quark (t,c,u) and down type quark ( b,s,d). The answer is yes.
Richard McCarthy said:
Where can I find a resource to understand what all the possibilities are for an up quark converting into other quarks of same or other generations?

The couplings of the W boson to any up type down type quark pair are described by the CKM matrix ( see http://pdg.lbl.gov/2014/reviews/rpp2014-rev-ckm-matrix.pdf for their measured values).

As mfb mentioned, for a process to be possible other conditions have to be met as well, such as Energy and Momentum conservation.

So, for example, the decay W\rightarrow tb is impossible.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top