W+ decay modes neglect mass branching ratiosQ

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement


The question is that the decay modes for the ##W+## boson are , ##e^+ v_{e}, \mu^+ v_{\mu}, \tau^+ v_{\tau}, ud', cs' ##, where a ' denotes a anitquark, neglecting the masses of the decay products estimate the branching ratios of the ##W+##?

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the lepton decays differ to quark decays in the way that quarks come in 3 colours.

I however thought that the quark decays would be reduced, as a pose to more likely, than the lepton decays by a factor of ##3##.

My reasoning is that , (I believe you treat the 2 quark system as a meson and so the colours must add to neutral, I don't know whether the situation differs if the quarks are unbound or you should consider them unbound in this decay, if someone could answer this, thanks?) , if one of the quarks takes a particular colour, the colour of the other antiquark,say, is immediatey constrained by this as it must be of the same colour, so there is only a ##1/3## chance that it gets the right colour.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At this energy, the quarks can be considered as unbound. They will hadronize later, at a lower energy scale.

binbagsss said:
if one of the quarks takes a particular colour, the colour of the other antiquark,say, is immediatey constrained by this as it must be of the same colour, so there is only a 1/3 chance that it gets the right colour.
You can treat the different quark colors as different particles. Then this constraint is equivalent to "if one particle is a positron, then the other particle has to be an electronneutrino" (as opposed to other neutrinos, or quarks, or whatever) - nothing that would make the decay less likely.
The colors just give three different decay modes: u green d' antigreen, u red d' antired, u blue d' antiblue.
 
mfb said:
At this energy, the quarks can be considered as unbound. They will hadronize later, at a lower energy scale.

.

Thanks. I see here as the W boson is colourless so the two quarks colour must sum to zero irrespective of whether it is a meson or not, in the general case of an unbound quark system the colour does not need to sum to zero?
 
binbagsss said:
I see here as the W boson is colourless so the two quarks colour must sum to zero irrespective of whether it is a meson or not
Right.

binbagsss said:
in the general case of an unbound quark system the colour does not need to sum to zero?
Right. Gluon+gluon -> quark+antiquark can lead to different colors, for example.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top