W = F d cos θ Is Algebra Okay for Work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter peacerosetx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Cos Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating work using the formula W = F d cos θ, specifically in the context of an exam preparation problem. The user correctly identifies the values for force and distance but struggles with calculating cos(30°) without a calculator, mistakenly believing it to be 1/2. Participants clarify that the cosine of 30 degrees is actually √3/2, which is essential for arriving at the correct work value of 836 J. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding trigonometric values, especially for special right triangles, and the user expresses a desire to learn how to compute these values without a calculator. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for a solid grasp of algebra and trigonometry in physics problems.
peacerosetx
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Greetings all :blushing:

Homework Statement


Greetings all this is the basic type of problem that I am having. W = F d cos θ. This is not for homework this is for my preparation for an exam.

If you were pulling a box like in the example above, which moves 12.7 m when you pull
along the rope with a force of 76.0 N, determine how much work you did.


Homework Equations


it has to do with the Work:: W = F d cos θ



The Attempt at a Solution


I have the answer which is given as:

W = F d cos θ
= 76.0 N (12.7 m) cos30.0°
W = 836 J

The problem is that I do not know how to multiply cos30.0 to know how you get 836 J

I have tried to turn it into .5 so that it would be = 76.0 N(12.7m) (.5) but when I multiply it all together I get 482 and not 836 J

Can you please help me figure this out is it the way I am doing the algebra that is not correct or my conversion of the cos 30? Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

The cosine of 30 degrees is NOT 1/2. That's why you didn't get the right answer. Generally speaking, All you're expected to do is to use a calculator to figure out what cos(30o) is.
 
cepheid said:
Welcome to PF.

The cosine of 30 degrees is NOT 1/2. That's why you didn't get the right answer. Generally speaking, All you're expected to do is to use a calculator to figure out what cos(30o) is.

Yes but for this exam that I will take I am not allowed to use a calculator. And I really would like to know how to use cosine and multiply with it not only for this but for other things as well. Do you know how to get to get to836 J without a calculator, or is it too hard to compute without a calculator please? Thank you. The examples seem to feel that we can do it on a scratch piece of paper. Thank you for your response
 
The sine and cosine of 30° (π/6 radians) and 60° (π/3 radians) are supposed to be easy to remember or derive because in this situation you have a special right triangle known as a 30°-60°-90° right triangle:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_right_triangles#30-60-90_triangle

By the way, your algebra and method is fine. You just had the wrong numbers.
 
cepheid said:
The sine and cosine of 30° (π/6 radians) and 60° (π/3 radians) are supposed to be easy to remember or derive because in this situation you have a special right triangle known as a 30°-60°-90° right triangle:


Thank you for the information and the welcome I am still confused as to how to solve the equation. I will work on it some more though. God bless
 
peacerosetx said:
Yes but for this exam that I will take I am not allowed to use a calculator.
Then how did you multiply (76.0 N) * (12.7 m)? I guess you could have done it by hand, but I don't think a physics exam that doesn't allow calculators would ask you to do that.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top