Water Circling Drain Coriolis effect

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around understanding the flow rate of water in a cone-shaped funnel while considering the Coriolis effect. Participants suggest simplifying the problem by comparing it to a hockey puck sliding down an ice cone, emphasizing the importance of energy, momentum, and angular momentum conservation. The Coriolis effect is acknowledged as a minor pseudoforce that influences the flow dynamics. A breakdown of the problem is encouraged to leverage existing knowledge of physics and geometry for a clearer understanding. Overall, the conversation highlights the value of conceptualizing complex systems through simpler analogies.
ethopianprince
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Lets say a cone shaped funnel was made as I was draining water (due to coriolis effect) and that there is a given circumferential velocity (lets say its 5m/s) at a certain radius of the cone (lets say 15 cm), also the cone's vertex is inside the drain and is a certain distance (lets say this is 20 cm) from the drain. In this case how would one get to figuring out the flow rate at the start of the cone (at r=15cm) and at the vertex of the cone?

Just a situation I would like to know about IF it shows up on the Physics C test(s), you can never be too sure :P
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
Leaving aside the coriolis effect for a bit, and the water thing, and just look at a simpler system to try to understand what is going on. How about an ice cone with a hockey-puck sliding down it? Then you can use your understanding of sliding on a slope with negligible friction.

If you just drop the puck, it slides right down.
If you give it a sideways push, you can make is spiral down.
Having to stay in contact with the cone wall puts a constraint on the angle of the spiral.
Because of the constricting circle, the speed around the spiral also increases.
To work it out you need to realize that energy, momentum and angular momentum are all conserved.

Water flow can be derived by considering a small volume of the water being like the puck and the coriolis effect adds an extra very small pseudoforce.
 
So many things I don't want to think about at this hour -_- but thanks! a more step by step procedure would've been better but this way its better! thanks for your help!


Simon Bridge said:
Welcome to PF;
Leaving aside the coriolis effect for a bit, and the water thing, and just look at a simpler system to try to understand what is going on. How about an ice cone with a hockey-puck sliding down it? Then you can use your understanding of sliding on a slope with negligible friction.

If you just drop the puck, it slides right down.
If you give it a sideways push, you can make is spiral down.
Having to stay in contact with the cone wall puts a constraint on the angle of the spiral.
Because of the constricting circle, the speed around the spiral also increases.
To work it out you need to realize that energy, momentum and angular momentum are all conserved.

Water flow can be derived by considering a small volume of the water being like the puck and the coriolis effect adds an extra very small pseudoforce.
 
A step-by-step would be a "mindless walkthrough" ... you learn more this way.
What I'm hoping you'll see is that you already know the physics and the geometry to work it out as soon as the problem gets broken down.
So it's better to have a walkthrough in the sense it's easier and faster - but it is better this way for different and more meaningful reasons :)
Enjoy.
 
Haha I will! just not today.. sleep>physics
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top