Chemistry Water Molecules in CuSO4.5H2O: How Many are Attached by Coordinate Bond?

  • Thread starter Thread starter utkarshakash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molecules Water
AI Thread Summary
In CuSO4.5H2O, the question revolves around how many water molecules are attached by coordinate bonds. The discussion highlights that copper exists as Cu2+, which has a vacant d-orbital, leading to an initial assumption of one water molecule forming a coordinate bond. However, it is clarified that there are actually two water molecules involved in coordinate bonding. Additionally, the complex structure is noted as [Cu(H2O)4]²⁺SO4²⁻·H2O, suggesting that four water molecules are coordinated in total. The conclusion emphasizes the complexity of copper's bonding in this hydrated salt.
utkarshakash
Gold Member
Messages
852
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


How many water molecule in CuSO4.5H2O attached only by coordinate bond?

The Attempt at a Solution



Copper exists in the form of Cu2+. So, it has one vacant d-orbital. The answer should then be 1. But it's 2 :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
utkarshakash said:

Homework Statement


How many water molecule in CuSO4.5H2O attached only by coordinate bond?

The Attempt at a Solution



Copper exists in the form of Cu2+. So, it has one vacant d-orbital. The answer should then be 1. But it's 2 :(

Copper can form complexes but I don't see how the answer is 2. To my knowledge, it exists as ##[Cu(H_2O)_4]^{+2}SO_4^{2-}\cdot H_2O##. Hence, the answer should be 4.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top