Wave function in terms of Basis Functions

Domnu
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Problem
We have the function g(x)=x(x-a) \cdot e^{ikx}. Express g(x) in the form

\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n \psi_n (x)

where

\psi_n = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}} \sin \(\frac{n\pi x}{a}\)

Solution
I have absolutely no clue as to how to start... I know a bit about Fourier series, but here, the function g(x) has an infinite period.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually wait... we can just let g(x) go from 0 to a, since it's supposed to model a particle in a box from potential walls 0 to a.
 
my guess would be that you could do it from 0 to a. So, I believe the problem now is to find the expansion coefficients An. To do this you will have to use Fourier's principle of orthogonality. I'm not 100 percent sure though, but it seems reasonable.
 
The set \{\psi_{n}(x)\} is complete, which means you can express any (well behaved, piecewise continuous) function as a linear combination of its elements. The coefficients which act as weights are to be determined by Fourier's theorem.

These are actually eigenfunctions for a particle in a 1D box. Eigenfunctions are complete by definition.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top