Wave Interference and Polarization

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on wave interference and polarization, specifically regarding two identical waves with different oscillation directions. The first wave oscillates out of the screen while the second oscillates within the screen's plane, leading to constructive interference at a specific point. The amplitude for the first image is correctly identified as 2A, while the second image's amplitude is A√2, though the latter does not qualify as constructive interference due to the perpendicular polarization. The conversation also touches on why the angle between waves is often ignored in double-slit experiments, concluding that it is typically due to the angle being too small to significantly affect the phase shift. Understanding these nuances in wave behavior is crucial for grasping interference concepts in electromagnetic waves.
jaumzaum
Messages
433
Reaction score
33
I'm studying wave interference and having trouble to understand some concepts. I would like to ask what would happen in the 2 situations below

Image 1


Image 2


Both waves are identical, have the same frequency, amplitude and velocity. They are polarized on the direction shown (first one oscilates going out of the screen, second one on the plane of the screen). At the red circle they interfere construtively (that means A.Cos(...) are equal). The waves have perpendicular propagation directions. What will be the amplitude on the red points?

I would say 2A for the first image and A √2 for the second. Is it right?

I'm asking because on the slit experiment (OEM interference) my book (and everybody) seems to treat constructive interference as 2A, ignoring the angle between the waves. Why is that?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
You're correct about the amplitudes. But I would not consider the second example to be constructive interference, I only associate that term if the waves are polarized in the same direction.

Or put another way, try to imagine setting up destructive interference (amplitude is zero) for your plane-polarized example. It can't be done.

Hope that helps.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I helps :)

try to imagine setting up destructive interference

You are right, I used "constructive" because I didn't have other world to use. The amplitude should range from A to A√2, so there will never be a destructive interference.

In the previous post I wrote OEM where I should have written EMW (in portuguese "onda elétromagnética), in english "electromagnetic wave"), sorry for that

Now come the second question. For the second wave we had to consider the angle between them because the wave was oscilating on the plave of the screen. An EMW has 2 fields (electic and magnetic) that are perpendicular to each other, so there will always be a component of one (or both) fields that will be on the plane of the screen. So in the double slit experiment, why they ignore the angle between the waves when they find the phase shift? Is it because the angle is too small?
 
Yes, exactly.

(Sorry about the delay in responding.)
 
Back
Top