Wave Motion Problem Solving Tips

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a wave motion problem involving two point sources generating in-phase waves. The user expresses confusion about the relevant equations and the lack of instructional resources from their physics instructor. A solution is provided, indicating that the distance from the x-axis to the first nodal line can be calculated using the formula Y = L*(1/2)*λ/d, with specific values for L and d. The calculated distance is Y = 5λ. A helpful website is also suggested for further learning on the topic.
Physicsisfun2005
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
I am having difficulty grasping what to do for this problem:

Two point sources located (0, +/- 2.5(lambda)) are generating waves in phase. Compute the distance from the x-axis to the first nodal line at
x=50(lambda)


I'm not sure what equations to use. My physics instructor is terrible and we don't even use a textbook...instead we have to read his "readings". I don't really grasp wave motion very well.....if u have a link to a wesite that can help be out that would be great.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physicsisfun2005 said:
I am having difficulty grasping what to do for this problem:

Two point sources located (0, +/- 2.5(lambda)) are generating waves in phase. Compute the distance from the x-axis to the first nodal line at
x=50(lambda)
The distance "Y" off the x-axis at the point x=(L) where the first nodal line (i.e., the first minimum) occurs is given by:
Y = L*(1/2)*λ/d
where "λ" is the wavelength, and "d" the distance between the 2 sources. Using {L = 50λ} and {d = 2*(2.5λ) = 5λ}, we get:
Y = (50λ)*(1/2)*(λ)/(5λ) = (5λ)

For more information regarding this subject, try the following web site:
http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/gbssci/phys/Class/light/u12l3c.html


~~
 
Last edited by a moderator:
excellent.....thank you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top