Wave Nature of Light - Calculating Wavelength (Double Slit Exp)

AI Thread Summary
Monochromatic light passing through two narrow slits 0.046 mm apart creates a fringe pattern on a screen 5.30 m away, with successive fringes 7.0 cm apart. The wavelength of the light can be calculated using the formula λ = dx2 / 2L, where x2 is the fringe separation. The initial calculation yielded λ = 3.01 * 10^-7 m, which corresponds to ultraviolet light, indicating it is not visible. A correction was suggested, indicating a potential error in the application of the formula, specifically regarding the factor of 2. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately applying the equations related to Young's double-slit experiment.
PeachBanana
Messages
189
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Monochromatic light falls on two very narrow slits 0.046 mm apart. Successive fringes on a screen 5.30 m away are 7.0 cm apart near the center of the pattern. Determine the wavelength of the light to two significant figures.

Homework Equations



x2 ≈ Lθ2 = L (2λ) / d

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm guessing the θ is very small so I can assume sin θ ≈ θ in radians. When the problem said the successive fringes were 7.0 cm apart near the center of the pattern, I thought that meant x2 was 7.0 cm above x1.

λ = dx2 / 2L
λ = (0.07 m)(4.6 *10^-5 m) / (2 * 5.30 m)
λ = 3.01 * 10^-7 m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think there is a factor of 2 missing (or too much) somewhere. With the distance d between the slits, two adjacent fringes appear with an angle of ##\alpha \approx \frac{\lambda}{d}## between them.
In addition: With twice your calculated wavelength, the light is visible.
 
I multiplied my answer by "2" and got it correct but I am still unsure why I should have multiplied by "2." Were you stating at 3.01 * 10 ^-7 m light is not visible?
 
That corresponds to 301nm - ultraviolet radiation.

but I am still unsure why I should have multiplied by "2."
I think you divided by 2, where you shouldn't have done that.
 
It looks like you picked up a wrong formula there. Take a look at 'Young's slits' in Wikipedia.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top