Wave or Particle: What Defines Electromagnetic Radiation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter asdf1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Electromagnetic radiation is understood through two frameworks: classical theory views it as wave motion, while quantum theory describes it as a stream of particles. This duality means that electromagnetic radiation can exhibit both wave-like and particle-like properties, depending on the context. For instance, light consists of photons, yet demonstrates wave characteristics, as shown in Young's interference experiment. The concept of wave-particle duality is crucial in modern physics and applies to various particles, including electrons. Understanding this paradox is essential for grasping the complexities of electromagnetic radiation.
asdf1
Messages
734
Reaction score
0
why is electromagnetic radiation considered as wave motion according to the classical theory and as a stream of particles according to the quantum theory?
these two views are so different, so which one is right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both are actually. It appears, simply put, that it sometimes 'behaves' as a particles and sometimes as waves.
Take light for example, we know it consists of photons but Young's (interference) experiment clearly showed that it has a wave-nature as well.
 
A good way to understand this is probably to read up about the wave/particle duality. This should be applicable for all textbooks.

Like TD said, radiation, behaves like waves and particles. Its a parradox that is very important in modern physics. Its not much help but its something tht needs to read about. I hope I have pointed you in the right direction.

hhh79bigo
 
There is no difference and it is not a matter of one being right. At that size, there is no clear distinction between "particles" and "waves"- even electrons can be thought of as either particles or waves depending on which is better for the particular problem.
 
hmm... i see~
thanks! :)
 
very good! i get some new ideas
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top