I What is the width of a wave packet?

RicardoMP
Messages
48
Reaction score
2
I'm reading Gasiorowicz's Quantum Physics and at the beggining of chapter 2, SG introduces the concept of "wave packet" and gaussian functions associated to them. The first attached image is the 28th page of the book's 1st edition I suppose, and my question is about the paragraph inside the red box. I suppose f(x) is a normal distribution. What does SG means by the function's width? Is it its FWHM? If it were, wouldn't the width be 2\sqrt{2ln(2)}\sigma? Or if not, why is the width of order 2\sqrt{2}, since the function at x=\pm 2\sqrt{2} falls to \frac{1}{e} of its peak value?
The second attached image is the "same page" from the 3rd edition (which I found harder to understand) and another explanation (green box). How can I conclude that, since the "square falls 1/3 of its peak value when \alpha(k-k_0)^2=1, \Delta k = \frac{2}{\sqrt{\alpha}}? Is this reffering to the standard deviation \sigma in the normal distribution (third attached image)?
I hope I'm not missing something obvious.
Thank you for your time!
 

Attachments

  • SG1.PNG
    SG1.PNG
    35 KB · Views: 494
  • SG2.PNG
    SG2.PNG
    87.6 KB · Views: 493
  • standarddeviation.PNG
    standarddeviation.PNG
    3.6 KB · Views: 527
Physics news on Phys.org
It says in the red box it means "full width, 1/e times maximum"
 
MisterX said:
It says in the red box it means "full width, 1/e times maximum"
And is there a reason for using "full width, 1/e times maximum" instead of FWHM?
 
For a Gaussian distribution, this gives you a value equal to the standard deviation of the distribution, which is actually the more fundamental definition. $$\Delta x = \sigma_x = \sqrt {\langle x^2 \rangle - {\langle x \rangle}^2}$$ Actually, the standard deviation is a half-width (think ##\mu \pm \sigma##), so if you want to compare it to a full-width, you need a factor of 2.
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top