Wave Problem: Length & Velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Turbo Math
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave
AI Thread Summary
A stone falling into a lake created 40 waves in 4 seconds, with an outer circle radius of 1.6 meters. The problem involved calculating the wavelength and velocity of these waves. Initial attempts yielded incorrect results, but the correct approach identified that 40 wavelengths span the radius, leading to a wavelength of 0.04 meters. The velocity of the waves was determined to be 0.4 m/s. The discussion highlighted the importance of understanding the relationship between the radius and the wavelengths in circular wave patterns.
Turbo Math
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Wave problem

Homework Statement



a small stone fell into alake causing 40 waves after 4 seconeds, if the radius of the outter circle is 1.6 meters, find the length of the occurred wave and its velocity

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



well i got two different solutions so far cause i couldn't determine what exactly was meant by (r=1.6m & length of the occurred wave):

1- f = 10 Hz

lambda/4 = 1.6
lambda = 6.4 m

v = lambda.f
= 6.4 × 10
= 64 m/s

========================

2- v = x/t

x = 2pi.r
= 10 m

v = 10/4
= 2.5 m/s (oO)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Neither approach is good. Instead, picture what's going on. The waves travel outward from the center. The outer radius tells you how far the first wave traveled in the given time. Use that to find the speed of the wave.

Also, you have 40 waves (and thus 40 wavelengths) stretched out over that radius. How big is each wavelength if 40 of them add to the outer radius?
 
aha! so:

v = 1.6/4
= 0.4 m/s

and...

lambda = 0.4/10
= 25 m

i hope i got at least closer ^^
 
Turbo Math said:
aha! so:

v = 1.6/4
= 0.4 m/s
Good!

and...

lambda = 0.4/10
= 25 m
Not good. If 40 wavelengths span 1.6 m, how can each wavelength be 25 m?
 
I don't think i get it :confused:

is it that i reversed the final result 25->0.04 (this happens all the time and its really annoying) or i simply skipped a step that i can't figure?
 
Turbo Math said:
is it that i reversed the final result 25->0.04 (this happens all the time and its really annoying) or i simply skipped a step that i can't figure?
That must have been what you did. You wrote .4/10 (which is correct), but you reversed the answer.

What I would have done is this:
40 Wavelengths = 1.6 m
1 Wavelength = (1.6 m)/40 = 0.04 m
 
I knew it :smile:

the problem was that i haven't known that the wavelengths make out the radius as this is my first encouter with circular waves

anyways thanks a lot Doc Al cya :cool:
 
Back
Top