Wave propagation in elastic tubes.

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on wave propagation in elastic tubes, a scenario is presented where a wave travels through a thin elastic tube into a thicker one filled with water. It is assumed that there is no wave reflection at the junction between the two tubes. The relationship between the wave speeds and amplitudes is explored, highlighting that the mechanical impedance of each tube plays a crucial role in determining these values. The conclusion drawn is that the amplitude of the wave decreases when moving from the thinner tube to the thicker tube due to the higher impedance of the thicker tube. This analysis emphasizes the importance of understanding wave behavior at discontinuities in elastic media.
somasimple
Gold Member
Messages
765
Reaction score
5
Hi All,

Here is my question regarding the solution of this little movie =>
http://www.somasimple.com/flash_anims/ap_003.swf

A thin elastic tube (thickness = 1) is connected with a thicker one (40 times thicker than the previous section). The tubes are poured with water.
A wave is is traveling in the first section changing the shape of the tube (I emphasized the deformation on the movie). Its speed (constant) is known and equals to c1.

What happens when the wave reaches the thicker tube?
It is supposed that thre is no wave reflection.

Is c2 > c1?
How is the amplitude changed?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Step discontinuities like this are a bit different than what I am used to, but I would imagine that this would get you in the ballpark of where you need to be. However, looking at what you have provided, I'm not convinced you have enough information provided to answer the question.

At the discontinuity, there will be a reflected and a transmitted wave due to the incident wave. You can get a feel for the relative values by looking at the mechanical impedance of each tube.

Set the small tube to be T1 and the larger to be T2. This would result in Z1 and Z2 as the two corresponding impedances, where

Z = \rho c where
\rho=density
c=speed of sound in the medium

The incident wave is usually described in terms of
u_i(x,t)=A_ie^{i(\omega t-kx)}

The reflected and transmitted waves are in the form of
u_r(x,t)=A_re^{i(\omega t+kx)}
u_t(x,t)=A_te^{i(\omega t-kx)}

So, the expression that relates the A coefficients looks like:

\frac{A_t}{A_i}=\frac{2Z_1}{Z_1+Z_2}

This leads to the fact that you must either already know the speed of sound in both media or you must know something about either the transmitted or reflected waves.
 
Last edited:
Hi,

Thanks for the reply!
It is is just a virtual hypothesis.

With the enounced problem may I conclude that amplitude is lowered because impedance Z2>Z1?
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top