Wavelength, emission spectrum, electron transitions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the wavelength of the emission spectrum for the He+ ion during an electron transition from n = 3 to n = 1. The user initially applied the Rydberg equation for hydrogen, resulting in a wavelength of 102.6 nm, which aligns with the Lyman series. However, the correct wavelength for He+ is 25.6 nm, as the Rydberg constant must be adjusted for the ion's +2 charge due to its additional protons. Participants emphasize the need to use the modified Rydberg equation specific to He+. Understanding the derivation of the Rydberg constant for He+ is crucial for accurate calculations.
FsLiu
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Determine the wavelength (in nm, to one decimal place) of the line in the emission spectrum of the He+ ion produced by a transition from n = 3 to n = 1.

Homework Equations


I used the Rydberg equation for this, although I'm not sure it is the correct one to use.
fa7bd92080914c973a88453a20c0c730.png



The Attempt at a Solution


Plugging in n1=1 and n2=3, I get an answer of 102.6nm. A search on wikipedia for the Lyman series also shows that transition from n=3 to n=1 is 102.6nm.

The solution given, however, is 25.6nm. Obviously I am not understanding the question. Help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Rydberg constant will be different for He+ than for hydrogen because He+ has more protons in its nucleus.
 
The equation you used is for Hydrogen. The He ion has a charge of +2, so the Rydberg constant is modified. Go back and look up the equation for how this Rydberg constant is derived.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top