Wavelengths in fused silica and in silicon for photons

SpiderMan1988
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Compute the wavelengths in fused silica and in silicon for photons whose free-space wavelengths are 800 nm, 1300 nm, and 1550 nm.


Homework Equations


This is the problem, I'm not sure what equation to use and the textbook does not seem to say, well what little I have of the text because I was forced to take pictures from a classmate's book.


The Attempt at a Solution


I have a feeling the equation might be ω0=(λ f)/( ∏ω) but this is under a section about Gaussian light-beams, something the problem makes no reference to anyway. I just need the equation and I can solve the rest from there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SpiderMan1988 said:

Homework Statement


Compute the wavelengths in fused silica and in silicon for photons whose free-space wavelengths are 800 nm, 1300 nm, and 1550 nm.

Homework Equations


This is the problem, I'm not sure what equation to use and the textbook does not seem to say, well what little I have of the text because I was forced to take pictures from a classmate's book.

The Attempt at a Solution


I have a feeling the equation might be ω0=(λ f)/( ∏ω) but this is under a section about Gaussian light-beams, something the problem makes no reference to anyway. I just need the equation and I can solve the rest from there.
Do you know the index of refraction for fused silica and silicon ?

How does the wavelength of light depend upon the index of refraction of the material that the light is passing through?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top