- #1

- 43

- 0

I know that the velocity of air at 20 degrees Celsius is 343 m/s.

I know that the velocity of freshwater at 20 degrees Celsius is 1482 m/s.

... How in the heck do I figure this out??

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

In summary, at a height of 15 meters above the surface of a freshwater lake, a sound pulse is generated. The echo from the bottom of the lake returns to the point of origin 0.130 s later. The air and water temperatures are 20°C. The depth of the lake is 255.65 meters.

- #1

- 43

- 0

I know that the velocity of air at 20 degrees Celsius is 343 m/s.

I know that the velocity of freshwater at 20 degrees Celsius is 1482 m/s.

... How in the heck do I figure this out??

Physics news on Phys.org

- #2

- 135

- 0

- #3

- 44

- 0

The depth of the lake will come out of how long it would take the wave to travel through water at its speed. Don't forget it makes two trips.

- #4

- 43

- 0

velocity of air = [distance/time] ...

343 = 15 / time

time = .0437 seconds ... multiply by 2 (to take the account for the return trip) ... therefore, time = .0875 seconds.

- #5

- 43

- 0

... so, my guess is ...

velocity of fresh water = lambda * frequency ...... 1 / time = frequency ...

... using .0875 as a reference ... frequency = 23.5294 Hz.

... am I missing something ... subtracting from total time ?

- #6

- 44

- 0

Why are you treating water differently than air? You get the distance in just the same way.

- #7

- 135

- 0

Just work backwatds from what you got b4. Subtract the total time from the time in air which gives you the total time in water. You should be able to get it from here.

- #8

- 767

- 16

subtract from this the time spent in the air using: time=distance/speed.

then use what's left over to find the distance traveled in the water.

Don't forget you're dealing with 2 way travel time, meaning you have to be careful with what distances you use, draw a diagram if this isn't clear.

- #9

- 43

- 0

- #10

- 43

- 0

Anyone else want to take a chance at this?

- #11

- 43

- 0

Don't I have to multiply the time in the water by 2?

- #12

- 44

- 0

sailordragonball said:Don't I have to multiply the time in the water by 2?

Yes.

Like I said... once you subtract the time it takes the wave to travel in the air, you have the time it takes to travel in the water. You know how fast it moves and how much time it takes... use kinematics to find the distance,

- #13

- 43

- 0

... 0.130 * 2 = .260 seconds in the water.

... I subtracted the calculated time from the air ...

... .260 - .0875 = .1725 total seconds.

... taking the kinematic equation [displacement = (total time * velocity of water at 20 degrees Celsius)] ...

... displacement = (.1725 * 1482)

... displacement = 255.65 meters ...

... I still got this wrong ... what did I do wrong?

- #14

- 44

- 0

It spent 0.0875 seconds in the air. This leaves 0.13 - 0.0875 = 0.0425 seconds that the wave spent in the water.

The wave had to go all the way down, then all the way up. The same distance each way. This means that half the time it was moving down, the other half up.

0.0425/2 = 0.02125 seconds moving down means that it took 0.02125 seconds for the wave to travel some distance at a speed of 1482 m/s.

- #15

- 43

- 0

... from your calculated time of 0.02125 seconds and the velocity of water at 20 degrees Celsius ...

... displacement = velocity of water * total time

... displacement = 1482 * .02125

... displacement = 31.4925 meters

... Thanks, Ethan ... I just didn't see it until I drew it. I should take your advice to heart next time ... LOL

- #16

- 767

- 16

yes that's right, i just checked it myself

- #17

- 43

- 0

LOL - it's all good!

- #18

- 44

- 0

More importantly, draw it next time! =)

- #19

- 43

- 0

That's for sure ... [sigh of relief]

A wave is a disturbance that travels through a medium, while sound is a type of wave that travels through air or other mediums and can be perceived by the human ear.

Sound travels faster in water than in air because water molecules are packed more closely together, allowing sound waves to travel more efficiently.

No, sound cannot travel in a vacuum because it requires a medium to travel through. In a vacuum, there are no molecules for sound waves to interact with and therefore cannot travel.

The speed of sound increases with depth in water because as the depth increases, the pressure also increases, causing the molecules to be packed more closely together and allowing sound waves to travel faster.

Temperature, humidity, and air pressure are all factors that can affect the propagation of sound in air. Higher temperatures and humidity can increase the speed of sound while higher air pressure can decrease it.

Share:

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 770

- Replies
- 18

- Views
- 879

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 437

- Replies
- 22

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 15

- Views
- 254

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 920

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 205

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 354

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 914

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 379