Interference of Waves in a Pool: Still Surface & Heating Effects

AI Thread Summary
In a pool with two wave machines operating in opposite phases, it is theoretically possible to create a still surface through destructive interference. However, even if the surface appears calm, the energy from the wave machines does not disappear; it is transformed rather than lost. The energy contributes to the formation of standing waves, where certain points remain stationary while others oscillate vertically. In an ideal medium without thermal motion, the energy would not convert to heat, but in real conditions, some energy inevitably becomes thermal energy. Therefore, while a still surface can be achieved, the wave energy still impacts the water's temperature.
philrainey
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to increase my understanding of what happens to waves with interference so I'll ask the following question to try and do so.
If one had a pool of water with a wave machine pulling the side in and out all along one side and an identical wave machine on the other side working in another phrase can it be possible to have a still surface on the pool, and if you can does the energy from the wave machines still heat up the water just as much?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. Your energetic argument is enough, I think. The equations describing wave motion would work in an ideal, continuous medium with no thermal motion. In that case there would be no mechanism to convert the ordered wave energy into disordered thermal energy, so where would the energy go? The best you can do is a standing wave, where some points on the surface are stationary, but the parts in between go up and down without appearing to move horizontally.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top