Weight before/after change in rotation Speed

Charanjit
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How would the weight of a person in some place (48 North and 123 West) change if the rotation rate increased so a day was 3 hours long?


Homework Equations



F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution



The above is not the only equation I think that is needed for this. Not sure about this, but coriolis force maybe needed. I just have no clue about this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sum of forces on the person = 0 since he's not going anywhere (hint: there are 3 terms in the equation, and yes, it's basically F = ma, except if you're going to derive evbrything you need from that one equation, remember that F and a are vectors, not just scalars).
 
Yes, I understand that F=ma = 0 since the person will not move. Now the three terms that come into play... would the centrifugal force help at all since the Earth is rotating?
 
Yes it would. Since gravitational attrcation is constant, irrespective of rotational speed, what force do you think has to change so the three add up to zero?
 
You are working in a frame fixed to the Earth which is a rotating object hence you are in a rotating frame. Which means that you need to use fictious forces. You need the centrifugal force. The coriolis force is tangent to the Earth's surface... Calculate the component of the centrifugal force normal to the surface of the earth...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top