Weird 2-spring problem with VERY limited data

  • Thread starter Thread starter McFate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data Weird
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two springs in a "v" shape with a 500g mass attached, where one spring stretches 9mm and the other 23mm. Participants express skepticism about calculating the spring constants without knowing the angles of the springs, as the stretching depends significantly on these angles. It is noted that the problem is more complex due to the need for assumptions about weight distribution and angles, which can lead to varying results. The consensus suggests that without additional measurements, such as the distance between the pegs, it is unlikely to derive a definitive solution. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the problem may not be solvable with the limited data provided.
McFate
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two springs are hung in a "v" shape, and a 500g mass is attached to the point of the v.

spring-prob.jpg


One spring is observed to stretch 9mm, the other 23mm.

Students are NOT permitted to measure any angles, before or after the weight is attached.

Is it possible to calculate the spring constants of the two springs?

Homework Equations



F = -kx (Hooke's law)

F = k1*x1*sin(θ) + k2*x2*sin(∅) (Vertical component of force if the two springs' angles were known.)

The Attempt at a Solution



The problem doesn't seem solvable to me. If the angle of the springs from horizontal is very small, then the stretching will be the equivalent of many times the weight that is actually applied. At 30 degrees from vertical, EACH spring stretches as much as it would if it had a 500g weight pulling on it vertically. At smaller angles, each stretches further yet.

For example, at 10 degrees for both springs:

F = k1*x1*sin(θ) + k2*x2*sin(∅)
0.5*9.8 N = (k1)*0.009m*.173 + (k2)*0.023m*.173
... the ".173" (sin(10)) means that each stretches about 3x what it would with the entire weight hanging vertically on that spring alone.

If the angle of the springs from vertical is very small, then each will more or less carry a share of the weight, and both will stretch less than they would if they carried the weight alone.

Note that this is an "engineering" class rather than a physics class, so I don't think that the answer has to be rigorous or exact. But as far as I can tell, you could make various assumptions (each spring carries about half of the weight, each spring carries a share in inverse proportion to the amount stretched, both angles about 45 degrees, both angles about 60 degrees, one 45 and the other 60 degrees, etc.) that yield wildly different results.

Is there something obvious that I'm missing, or is this more likely a "make guesses for the things you weren't allowed to measure" sort of problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you considered the horizontal force component's equilibrium condition?
 
Nesk said:
Have you considered the horizontal force component's equilibrium condition?

Thanks for the response.

If I had the angles of the springs, the horizontal tension being equal between the two springs would form the second equation for my two variables (k1, k2):

4.9N = k1*(0.009m)*sin(θ) + k2*(0.023m)*sin(∅)
and
k1*(0.009m)*cos(θ) = k2*(0.023m)*cos(∅)

I have the overall lengths of the two springs (had to measure that before and after the weight to figure out how much they stretched). I'm going to go back to the lab and measure the distance between the pegs. It's not something we were told we couldn't measure, and it will give me the third side of the triangle which will allow me to use those equations.

But the question I had was: IF all I had was the data given originally, is there any solution? (I think the answer is: "no.")
 
In order to measure the amount of stretch for each spring, you had to measure the un-stretched length of each spring. If you know the distance between the pegs, then you can find all the angles. (That may also be "illegal" in the eyes of the instructor.)

Compare the two configurations:
1.) The locations of the enuds of the springs with the weight hanging.

2.) The locations of the ends of the springs without the weight -- even if you reconstruct this "theoretically" using the measured nu-stretched lengths.​

Both x and y components are important for the equilibrium equations.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top