Weird: number of moles of NaOH in 20 ml of 1M NaOH

  • Thread starter Thread starter p3t3r1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moles Weird
AI Thread Summary
Calculating the number of moles in 20 ml of a 1M NaOH solution yields 20 mmol, derived from the formula 20 ml/1000 ml/L x 1M. Using the density approach, which considers the solution's density of 1.04 g/ml, incorrectly suggests 520 mmol due to misinterpretation of the solution's mass. The density of the entire solution includes mostly water, not just NaOH, making this method inaccurate. Molarity is defined as moles of solute per volume of solution, so the density is unnecessary for this calculation. Correctly applying molarity ensures accurate results without needing to factor in density.
p3t3r1
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi there, this is a not a homework question but rather question about the theory behind this problem.

Say if someone asks you to calculate the number of moles in 20 ml of a 1M NaOH solution, I would usually say it is going to be 20 mmol as you do 20 ml/1000 ml/L x 1M = 0.02 moles = 20 mmol.

However, if you consider the density approach, 1M of NaOH has a density of 1.04 g/ml so 20 ml is 20 x 1.04 g = 20.8 g/40 g/mol (MW of NaOH) that is going to yield 520 mmol of NaOH in 20 mll of 1 M NaOH.

Obviously the density approach give a number that makes no sense. I am just wondering why the density approach is not correct.

Cheers.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
1.04 g/ml is the density of the entire solution, most of which is water not NaOH.
 
p3t3r1 said:
Hi there, this is a not a homework question but rather question about the theory behind this problem.

Say if someone asks you to calculate the number of moles in 20 ml of a 1M NaOH solution, I would usually say it is going to be 20 mmol as you do 20 ml/1000 ml/L x 1M = 0.02 moles = 20 mmol.

However, if you consider the density approach, 1M of NaOH has a density of 1.04 g/ml so 20 ml is 20 x 1.04 g = 20.8 g/40 g/mol (MW of NaOH) that is going to yield 520 mmol of NaOH in 20 mll of 1 M NaOH.

Obviously the density approach give a number that makes no sense. I am just wondering why the density approach is not correct.

Cheers.

You are going wrong there, you shouldn't divide by the MW of NaOH. The 20.8g is the weight of the solution, so it makes no sense.
 
Say if someone asks you to calculate the number of moles in 20 ml of a 1M NaOH solution, I would usually say it is going to be 20 mmol as you do 20 ml/1000 ml/L x 1M = 0.02 moles = 20 mmol.

Uncomplicated! You are given 1 Molar NaOH. This is in moles per liter.

However, if you consider the density approach, 1M of NaOH has a density of 1.04 g/ml so 20 ml is 20 x 1.04 g = 20.8 g/40 g/mol (MW of NaOH) that is going to yield 520 mmol of NaOH in 20 mll of 1 M NaOH.

The density is not needed because you already are given the concentration is in moles per liter, and your question was for some number of milliliters; in this case, 0.020 liters. The given and the question do not involve density.
 
As the other posters said, you cannot use the density or volume of the entire solution. If you wanted to take the density approach, you would need to figure out the volume of NaOH in your solution, and multiply that by the density of solvated NaOH. That would give you the mass (which will be much smaller than your 20.8 g), which you could then divide by the molar mass.

The molarity calculations work because molarity is defined as moles SOLUTE/volume SOLUTION, so when you multiply by the volume of a solution it will cancel. In your calculations above, your units will not cancel because you are doing
20.8 g SOLUTION
-----------
40 g NaOH/mol NaOH
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top