Well-lubricated bicycle wheel problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter tatertot560
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bicycle Wheel
AI Thread Summary
A well-lubricated bicycle wheel initially rotating at 170 rpm takes 70 seconds to come to a stop, prompting a discussion on calculating the number of revolutions made during this time. The user converted the initial speed to 17.80 rad/s and attempted to apply circular motion kinematics equations but encountered confusion regarding the angular acceleration and final angular velocity. There was a suggestion to simplify the problem by determining the wheel's rotational speed at the midpoint (T=35 seconds) to aid in calculations. The importance of distinguishing between rpm and revolutions per second was also emphasized. Clarifying these concepts is crucial for accurately solving the problem.
tatertot560
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A well-lubricated bicycle wheel spins a long time before stopping. Suppose a wheel initially rotating at 170 rpm takes 70 s to stop.

A)If the angular acceleration is constant, how many revolutions does the wheel make while stopping?


Homework Equations


i used circular motion kinematics equations.


The Attempt at a Solution


i changed 170 rpm to 17.80 rad/s. then i used wf=wi+(alpha)(delta)t
wf=17.80 rad/s + (0-70s) = -52.2 rad/s^2
i used (theta)F= (theta)i + wi (delta)t +1/2 ((alpha)(delta)t)^2

i think i used the right equations but when i solve for wf i get -581 rad... don't know if that's the right answer.

i'd greatly appreciate the help :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are making this unnecessarily complex.

If the wheel starts at 170rpm at T=0 and is at 0rpm at T=70 and we know the deceleration is constant, what rotational speed was it turning at at T=35?
If we know that what can we do with that information?

Beware of rpm and revs per second!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top