What Acceleration Did Colonel John P. Stapp Experience When Stopping?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mpgriffis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
Colonel John P. Stapp achieved a land speed record of 1020 km/h on a rocket-propelled sled, stopping in 1.4 seconds. The acceleration experienced during this stop is calculated using the equation v = v(0) + at, with 1 g equating to 9.8 m/s². Initial attempts to calculate the acceleration resulted in incorrect values of 1239.06 g units. It is emphasized that proper unit conversion from km/h to m/s is crucial for accurate calculations. The discussion highlights the extreme nature of g-forces, noting that humans cannot survive high g-forces for extended periods.
mpgriffis
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A world's land speed record was set by Colonel John P. Stapp when in March 1954 he rode a rocket-propelled sled that moved along a track at 1020 km/h. He and the sled were brought to a stop in 1.4 s. In g units, what acceleration did he experience while stopping?

Homework Equations


I think I am supposed to use the constant acceleration equation
v = v(0) + at

1 g unit = 9.8m/s^2


The Attempt at a Solution


You only get two attempts to get it right. My first attempt was 1239.06 g units but it was wrong. My second time around i got -1239.06 g units but i was just wondering if anyone could double check it. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i'll try this Q...nah, can't get the ans, it is too hard sry because i oso g 1239.06g
 
kaisxuans said:
i'll try this Q...nah, can't get the ans, it is too hard sry because i oso g 1239.06g

Why are you responding to questions you can't answer? In txt? mpgriffis, convert km/hr to m/sec before you divide by g and time. Carefully. Humans surviving more than a few tens of g's for more than a fraction of a second is unheard of. I have no clue how either one of you got 1238.06g.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top