What Angle Should You Aim the Launcher to Hit a Target 10 cm Above the Floor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Esoptron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics Theta
AI Thread Summary
To determine the angle for launching a marble to hit a target 10 cm above the floor at a horizontal distance of 50 cm, the equations of motion are applied. The system of equations derived from the vertical and horizontal motion incorporates the muzzle velocity (v_0) and time (Δt). By isolating the trigonometric terms and dividing the equations, the relationship tan(θ) = (10 + 4.905Δt) / (50 - Δt) is established. This allows for the angle θ to be expressed in terms of Δt, facilitating further calculations during the lab. The discussion emphasizes the importance of algebraic manipulation to solve for the desired angle.
Esoptron
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use your calculated muzzle velocity (v_0) to determine the angle at which you would need to aim your launcher, fired from floor level, in order for your marble to land on a platform 10 cm above the floor, a horizontal distance of 50 cm from the launcher.

Homework Equations


x_f = x_0 + v_0 t + (1/2) a_x t^2
y _f= y_0 + v_0 t + (1/2) a_y t^2

The Attempt at a Solution


y _f= y_0 + v_0 t + (1/2) a_y t^2
10=Δt(sinΘ ⋅ v_0 - 1/2 ⋅ g ⋅Δt)
10=sinΘ ⋅ v_0 - 4.905(Δt)

x = x_0 + v_0 t + (1/2) a_x t^2
50=Δt(cosΘ ⋅ v_0 + 1/2 ⋅ 0 ⋅ Δt)
50=cosΘ ⋅ v_0 + 0 ⋅ Δt

Leads to this system of equations

v_0 ⋅ sinΘ - 4.905(Δt) - 10=0
v_0 ⋅ cosΘ + 0(Δt) - 50=0

- I don't know what the muzzle velocity is yet (This is prep for an upcoming lab) but I know that it is a constant and is the same for both equations so I'm leaving it as v_0.

- Looking at my final system of equations above, is it possible to get rid of Δt or express it in terms of constants, get theta by itself on the other side of the equal sign, and use that during the lab to see where the two equations would intersect to find an angle that would satisfy the question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looking at my final system of equations above, is it possible to get rid of Δt or express it in terms of constants, get theta by itself on the other side of the equal sign, and use that during the lab to see where the two equations would intersect to find an angle that would satisfy the question?
Yes. How would you normally solve simultaneous equations?
 
Hi there!

Don't get scared of being a little creative and putting algebra to your advantage! :) Here's a hint: for the two equations put the trigonometric term (## \sin(\theta) ## or ## \cos(\theta) ## ) on one side and the rest on the other side. Now divide the two equations. You should get ## \tan(\theta) = ## something. Now that's an easy step away from the answer you're looking for! ^^
 
Here's a hint: for the two equations put the trigonometric term (sin(θ) or cos(θ) ) on one side and the rest on the other side. Now divide the two equations. You should get tan(θ)= something.
OK - so: $$\tan\theta = \frac{10+(4.905)\Delta t}{50-\Delta t}$$ ... now what?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top