What Angles Reveal Second Order Bright Fringes in Diffraction?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the angles for second-order bright fringes in a diffraction grating problem. The user initially used the equation d sin(theta) = m(λ) but received feedback that their calculated sin(theta) value of 1.178 exceeds the possible range for sine, indicating no rational angle exists. It was suggested that the grating constant might be incorrectly stated as 10,000 lines per cm instead of the more typical 1,000 lines per cm. The user confirmed they had converted units correctly in their written work. The conclusion is that with such a fine grating, the second maximum does not appear.
Shahab Mirza
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi,
1. Homework Statement
Q : A diffraction grating with 10000 lines per CM is illuminated by yellow light of wavelength 589 nm, At what angles is the 2nd order bright fringes seen ?

Homework Equations


From my textbook , I got this equation , d sin theta = m (λ)

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok so what I did was that I plugged values properly , i.e
sin theta = mλ/d
For second order , m=2 so,
= (2) (589 X 10nm) / (1/10000 X 1/ 100)

and the answer is 1.178 , but out teacher said that this number is larger than 1 and so sin theta does not represent any rational angle , so tell me that how to know that sin theta in this case "1.178" does not represent any rational number , please help me out with this , Thanks [/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does 589x10 nm mean? You have to substitute the wavelength in meters.
The value you got for sin(theta) is correct, perhaps the grating constant is 1000/cm instead of 10000/cm. The grating constants are usually in the range of micrometers.
Your teacher is right, in case of such fine grating, the second maximum does not appear.
 
ehild said:
What does 589x10 nm mean? You have to substitute the wavelength in meters.
The value you got for sin(theta) is correct, perhaps the grating constant is 1000/cm instead of 10000/cm. The grating constants are usually in the range of micrometers.
Your teacher is right, in case of such fine grating, the second maximum does not appear.

Thanks for reply Sir ,
Actually in real problem which I solved on a paper I wrote 1/10000 X 1/100 and converted it into right unit .
Thanks a lot for your kind reply .
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top