What Are the Dimensions of a Wave Function in Various Box Problems?

armis
Messages
103
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Does the wave function have a dimension? If it does, what are the dimensions for 1D and 2D box problems?Can you generalise this to n dimensions?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Yes, it does have dimensions. For 1D box it's m^{-2} , for 2D box it's m^{-1} thus for n dimensions it should be m^{n-3} . Is this correct?<br /> <br /> thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it has no dimensions. p(r) = |\psi|^2 is the density of the probability of finding a practical in a specific location.

But maybe I'm wrong
 
a wave function inside a 1 dim box is
\Psi= \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}sin(\frac{px}{\hbar})
it appears it is per root meter, which is weird. but on the other hand, the probability in the interval dx is:
|\Psi|^{2} dx = \frac{1}{\sqrt{meter}}^{2}*meter = 1
which would make it dimensionless, which could make sense. I've never asked myself this.
 
Last edited:
It's not dimensionless. If it were, then when you integrated its square modulus over all space you would not get a pure number. (Note to the second poster - the modulus squared of the wavefunction is not a probability, but a probability density, which had dimensions.). That is, since

\int_{\rm all space} d\mathbf{r} \left|\psi(\mathbf{r})\right|^2 = 1

\psi(\mathbf{r}) must accordingly have the root of the inverse dimensions of d\mathbf{r}, which are length^{-1/2} for a 1D problem (d\mathbf{r} = dx), length^{-1} for a 2D problem (d\mathbf{r} = dxdy), etc.

So, the original poster is correct about the wave functions having dimensions, but you got the dimensions incorrect.
 
Last edited:
I stand corrected. although I did say |psy|^2 is the density of probability.
 
Mute said:
\psi(\mathbf{r}) must accordingly have the root of the inverse dimensions of d\mathbf{r}, which are length^{-1/2} for a 1D problem (d\mathbf{r} = dx), length^{-1} for a 2D problem (d\mathbf{r} = dxdy), etc.

Oh, I see. Thanks
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top