What Are the Dynamics in a Circular Orbit?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating dynamics in circular orbits, specifically focusing on the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom and the gravitational acceleration of the sun at Earth's orbit. Participants initially calculate the velocity of an electron orbiting a proton and later shift to discussing the acceleration due to gravity of the sun, emphasizing the importance of using the correct formulas and understanding the relationship between linear and angular measurements. There is confusion regarding the conversion between linear acceleration and revolutions per second, highlighting the need for clarity in units. The conversation also touches on a separate problem involving a roller coaster's speed at the top of a loop, indicating a struggle with applying the correct physics principles. Ultimately, the participants are working through complex physics concepts and calculations related to circular motion.
oldunion
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
In the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom, an electron (mass=9.1x10^-31kg) orbits a proton at a distance of 5.3x10^-11m. The proton pulls on the electron with an electric force of 9.2x10^-8N.

I did F=mv^2/r to solve for velocity. units don't match but i got 2.315. Centripetal acceleration next? I know I've made a mistake thus far.


Just came across this question:
What is the acceleration due to gravity of the sun at the distance of the Earth's orbit?

Thats all the info they give you, they want the answer in m/s^2 :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you calculated velocity correctly but you left off the scientific notation. Keep the velocity squared and use that to solve for the acceleration.

a = v^2 / r

This will give you the answer in m/s^2
 
As for the second part,what formula would u have to use...?

Daniel.
 
oldunion said:
Just came across this question:
What is the acceleration due to gravity of the sun at the distance of the Earth's orbit?

Thats all the info they give you, they want the answer in m/s^2 :rolleyes:

Hey, by the way don't use again the formula g = \frac{v^2}{r_{sun}} here, because you don't know the velocity! If R_{Earth} is the radius of the Earth, and we know g, then express your answer in terms of g and the ratio R_{Earth}/r_{sun}.
 
Last edited:
Yes,he does know the velocity.He can approximate the ellipse Earth is making around the sun and determine the velocity to approx 30Km/s...(Besides,even if you didn't know the physics to compute it,it's very well known,because it's tabulated :wink:)...

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
Yes,he does know the velocity.He can approximate the ellipse Earth is making around the sun and determine the velocity to approx 30Km/s...(Besides,even if you didn't know the physics to compute it,it's very well known,because it's tabulated :wink:)...

Daniel.

I don't think that is the purpose.
Wait a minute, why does the Earth velocity come up here? It won't do!
 
You probably forgot the question.There it is:"What is the acceleration due to gravity of the sun at the distance of the Earth's orbit?"

The acceleration is simply \frac{v^{2}}{R},where v is the orbital velocity of the Earth (namely ~30Km/s) and R is the mean distance Earth-Sun (~150*10^{9}m}.

Daniel.
 
It is the Earth moving, not the sun. So the formula you gave gives the centripetal acceleration of the Earth moving around the sun.
I understood the question like this: find the value of g at the distance the sun is.
 
Nope,it's the other way around.It should be the Earth graviting the sun."due to gravity of the sun" ring a bell...?"at the distance of the Earth's orbit"...Does this one ring a bell,then...?

Daniel.
 
  • #10
i got the second part. but the first part is incorrect.

a got a v^2 of 5.358x10^12 then i divided this by the radius of 5.3x10^-11= 1.011x10^23 which is not the answer.


edit: nevermind I am being retarded, they asked for it in revs/ second. is this a new equation or just dimensional analysis?
 
  • #11
Revolutions per second,well that's Hertz and normally,in SI revolutions doesn't have a unit...

Daniel.
 
  • #12
so how would i go from meters/s^2 to revs/second
 
  • #13
Hold it,one unit id for angular velocity (Hz) and the other is for linear acceleration.There's no way to go from one to the other...There are different quantities...

Daniel.
 
  • #14
oldunion said:
so how would i go from meters/s^2 to revs/second

a = \omega^2r

\omega = \sqrt{\frac{a}{r}}, where \omega is in rad/s.

to go to rev/s, you are looking for the frequency:

f = \frac{\omega}{2\pi}.
 
  • #15
no those units don't jive. you would end up with some fraction of #/T where t is the period. tried anyway, 5.99 or 9.42 incorrect
 
  • #16
Okay:What is velocity in m/s and what is the acceleration in m/s^{2}...?

Daniel.
 
  • #17
v^2= 5.358x10^12
a=1.011x10^23
 
  • #18
The first # is correct.The second looks good as well...You're done...

Daniel.
 
  • #19
dextercioby said:
The first # is correct.The second looks good as well...You're done...

Daniel.

yes but this doesn't solve my dilemma of how to find the rev/s


5.99x10^21 rad/s (assuming it is in rad/s for whatever reason) x 1 rev/2pirad=9.42x10^21
 
Last edited:
  • #20
Yes,if that 5.99\times 10^{21} rad \ s^{-1} is the correct "omega",then te final answer is correct.

Daniel.
 
  • #21
something isn't right. if you do the velocity you will get Newtons=kg/m, this works out to m/s^2. The acceleration is therefore inverse seconds...
 
  • #22
No.Trust me,everything is okay with the units.

Daniel.
 
  • #23
The computer doesn't like my answer, ill keep at it. But i just worked it out very clearly and when you do acceleration you get #/s. i have another question though.

As a roller coaster car crosses the top of a 30.0m-diameter loop-the-loop, its apparent weight is the same as its true weight. what is cars top speed?

sum of forces=m(v)^2/r obviously the radius is 15m, no mass is apparent and we must find velocity. I know there is a significant in them saying the apparent and actual weights are the same, sum of forces must be zero
 
  • #24
For the first problem,the units are m/s^{2} for LINEAR ACCELERATION and the same for ANGULAR ACCELERATION.It cannot be Hz...

For the second problem,you're on the right track,if i can say so...

Daniel.
 
  • #25
the problem asks for rev/s as the final answer though.

the second problem i am stuck. there must be another value i am not seeing because i need one more to solve.
 
  • #26
Yes,but that's not for acceleration...:wink:For the 2-nd:What other value do you need...?:bugeye:

Daniel.
 
  • #27
dextercioby said:
Yes,but that's not for acceleration...:wink:For the 2-nd:What other value do you need...?:bugeye:

Daniel.


1st problem, significantly lost.

second problem, answer is zero without further values. but zero is not a logical answer
 

Similar threads

Back
Top