What are the effects of boiling in a heat exchanger?

AI Thread Summary
Boiling in a heat exchanger with water as the coolant can lead to significant issues, including sudden pressure increases and potential loss of coolant if steam escapes without backpressure. The system is described as open, meaning the coolant is discarded, which could result in very low pressure unless dynamic effects create backpressure. The setup resembles a boiler, but the primary goal is to manage temperature rather than generate steam. If steam is not desired, increasing the coolant flow rate is necessary to prevent boiling. The discussion highlights the need for careful consideration of system design to avoid operational failures during testing.
TheHypnotoad
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a heat exchanger design, with water as the coolant. I'm running an analysis on this thing, and it looks like it's going to get hot. Like, 900F hot. So, of course this is going to be steam by the time it reaches the outlet. I'm really not a fluids kind of girl, but it's on me to tell the experimental engineer whether this test is going to end in tears, and if it's going to be a problem, I want to try to talk him into using a different coolant.

So, my question for forum! What happens to a heat exchanger when boiling occurs in the coolant flow? Should I be expecting sudden pressure increases? Losses in the maximum mass flow rate? Exploding heat exchangers?

Some more information:
-Fluid enters at around 200psi
-Coolant is not immediately vented at the outlet, but enters a manifold and is piped a few feet off to be vented

Thanks for your input!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF

Sounds like you are saying this is an open system - the coolant gets discarded? The pressure in the system will be very low since it is open, and any backpressure will be due to dynamic effects (the steam rushing out at probably supersonic speed) unless there are valves or other devices to create backpressure.

What you're describing is a boiler - turning water into steam is the main function. But whether you want steam or not depends on what the coolant is meant to do after it leaves the boiler. If you don't want steam, you'll need to increase the coolant flow rate until it can remove the heat without boiling.

Seems like an odd way to run a heat exchanger, but without knowing more details it is tough to know why you are doing this.
 
russ_watters said:
Welcome to PF

Sounds like you are saying this is an open system - the coolant gets discarded? The pressure in the system will be very low since it is open, and any backpressure will be due to dynamic effects (the steam rushing out at probably supersonic speed) unless there are valves or other devices to create backpressure.

What you're describing is a boiler - turning water into steam is the main function. But whether you want steam or not depends on what the coolant is meant to do after it leaves the boiler. If you don't want steam, you'll need to increase the coolant flow rate until it can remove the heat without boiling.

Seems like an odd way to run a heat exchanger, but without knowing more details it is tough to know why you are doing this.

Thanks for the response, Russ! You're right, it's an odd way to run a real heat exchanger . . . in reality, it's going to be an active cooling system. Eventually, they'll run the system with a combustible gas as the coolant, and they'll burn the gas to heat the panel. But for an initial test, they wanted to run something less combustible, like water. So yes, it's a bit of an odd setup to start out.

So it sounds like all that will happen here is as the water boils, the steam will rush out and I will be left with no coolant, unless a back pressure is applied, right? You asked if this was a boiler, but really, the point is to keep the thing under a certain temperature, and if I have no coolant, that's not going to fly. Sounds like the test engineer and I have some talking to do. . . .

And thanks for the welcome :) looks like a neat little forum around here :approve:
 
You might have troubles with the Leidenfront effect, take it into consideration.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
Back
Top