What are the Electric Field Lines and Flux in Coaxial Cables?

AI Thread Summary
Coaxial cables consist of a central copper wire and an outer copper shell with insulation in between. The discussion focuses on understanding electric field lines and flux using Gauss' law, particularly in three scenarios based on the charge per unit length: when the inner wire's charge is greater than, equal to, or less than that of the outer shell. The electric field inside the conductor is zero, and the charge on the inner surface of the outer cylinder must balance the charge on the inner wire. The remaining charge on the outer surface of the cylinder is determined by the difference between the charges on the inner wire and the outer shell. Understanding these relationships through Gauss' law simplifies the analysis of electric fields in coaxial cables.
ussrasu
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I don't really understand Gauss' law - any help with this question would be appreciated?

Coaxial cables are made of a copper wire in the center and a concentric cylindrical shell of copper outside, with insulating material in between and outside the shell. The charge per unit length of the cable are given as λ1 (positive) in the inner wire and −λ2 (negative) in the outer shell.

Sketch qualitatively the electric field lines on a plane perpendicular to the cable assuming it is very long.
Consider three cases:
(a) λ1 > λ2,
(b) λ1 = λ2 and
(c) λ1 < λ2.

Explain your diagrams using the concepts of flux and Gauss' law.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The key to understanding Gauss's law is that a Gaussian surface is a completely made up surface that you use as a tool. Since we have a wire in this problem, a good surface that perfectly encloses the wire is a cylinder(minus the bases). The cylinder's surface area would be 2\pi r^2 where r is the radial distance from the wire.

Now Gauss's Law states that \int E \bullet dA=q/\epsilon_0 , where q is the charge enclosed by the imaginary surface you just created.

So if you want the electric field, but you have charge that's enclosed by any area, even one you just made up, you can use that equation to find the electric field.

It's really useful, and it makes these types of problems a breeze once you understand it.
 
What happens in each of the situations though? i.e in parts a) b) and c) - what is different in each of them? And how do you explain these observations in terms of Gauss' Law and Flux?

Thanks :smile:
 
(Charges are considered per unit length)

The E field within the conductor is zero therefore the flux originated from charge + \lambda_1 = \frac{\lambda_1} {\epsilon_0} is to be terminated on the inner surface of the outer cylinder and thus charge on the inner surface of outer cylinder must be - \lambda_1

But the total charge on the outer cylinder is - \lambda_2 hence the rest of the charge remain on the outer surface and will be

- \lambda_2 + \lambda_1

now I think you may find the correct answer for all three cases.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top