What are the limitations of directional derivatives at (0,0)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jdstokes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivatives
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the non-existence of directional derivatives for the function f(x,y) at the point (0,0) in directions where both a and b are non-zero. Despite calculations suggesting a limit exists, the results vary based on the approach to (0,0), indicating that the directional derivative does not exist. Participants highlight the need to examine continuity and the behavior of the function as it approaches the origin from different paths. The use of polar coordinates is suggested as a method to clarify the situation. Ultimately, the confusion stems from the differing results obtained through various approaches, reinforcing the conclusion that the directional derivatives at (0,0) are indeed undefined.
jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
Let f(x,y) = \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \frac{xy}{\sqrt{x^2 + y^2}} &amp;, (x,y) \neq(0,0) \\<br /> 0 &amp; ,(x,y) = (0,0) \\<br /> \end{array}

Show that the directional derivatives at (0,0) in directions a\mathbf{i} + b\mathbf{j} with a\neq 0 and b\neq 0, do not exist.

Let \mathbf{u} = a\mathbf{i} + b\mathbf{j}

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> D_{\mathbf{u}}f(0,0) &amp; = \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{f(0+ ha,0 + hb) - f(0,0)}{h}<br /> &amp; = \lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{\frac{h^2ab}{\sqrt{h^2a^2 + h^2b^2}}}{h}<br /> = \frac{ab}{\sqrt{a^2 + b^2}}<br /> \end{align*}<br />

which if I'm not mistaken, exists. How do I show that this doesn't exist? Also, in order to show that f(x,y) is everywhere continuous, will it suffice to say that xy/sqrt(x^2 + y^2) is continuous when (x,y) != 0 and that the limit of xy/sqrt(x^2 + y^2) as (x,y) tends to (0,0) along the x-axis is 0?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone have any ideas? I'm really confused about this.
 
I'm not sure about this, but maybe they want you to take the directional derivative the usual way (dot the gradient into the direction vector), and then take the limit as (x,y)->0. I tried this, and it seemed like I got two different answers depending on how I approached 0. I think this would mean the derivative doesn't exist, even though both answers were finite. If you want to try this, I used polar coordinates and I think it made it easier.
 
<br /> \lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{\frac{h^2ab}{\sqrt{h^2a^2 + h^2b^2}}}{h}<br /> = \frac{ab}{\sqrt{a^2 + b^2}}<br />

You sure about that?
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top