I What are the necessary trig functions for finding the rotation formula?

Ben Wilson
Messages
90
Reaction score
16
I have a function of a 3 vector, i.e. f(+x,+y,+z) [ or for conveniance f=+++]

this function is repeated 4 times where:

f1 = + + +
f2 = + - +
f3 = - - +
f4 = - + +

I need a formula where i have a different vector for each function in a summation, to obtain the superposition of all 4 functions.

I'm having a nightmare trying to find a rotation formulae, can anyone help?

i'm guessing there will be some trig functions involved somewhere.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Ben Wilson said:
I need a formula where i have a different vector for each function in a summation, to obtain the superposition of all 4 functions.
Can you state that formula?

Ben Wilson said:
I'm having a nightmare trying to find a rotation formulae, can anyone help?
What do you mean by "rotation formulae"?

Ben Wilson said:
i'm guessing there will be some trig functions involved somewhere.
Do you need to figure out the angles (like Euler angles) necessary for those rotations? Like knowing that you go from +x,+y,+z to -x,+y,+z by a certain combination of α, β, and γ for a given +x,+y,+z?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top