What are the possible solutions for the TISE in the infinite square well model?

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31

Homework Statement



As part of my homework, I am solving the TISE for the infinite square well model.

The potential is zero for |x| =< a and infinite otherwise.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



For |x| >= a, the wavefunction is zero.

For |x| =< a, there are three possible cases:
1. E > 0
2. E = 0
3. E < 0

for the following TISE:

\frac{d^{2}u}{dx^{2}} + \frac{2mE}{hcross^{2}}u = 0.

For E > 0, the solutions are sinusoidal.

For E = 0, u = A + Bx.

For E < 0, the solutions are exponentials.

The problem is the only solution is sinusoidal. What have I done wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why is that a problem?
 
failexam said:
For |x| >= a, the wavefunction is zero.

For |x| =< a, there are three possible cases:
1. E > 0
2. E = 0
3. E < 0

The energy of the particle can never be lower than the minimum potential energy. In other words, E+V_min > 0 for every stationary state. That's why you can exclude cases 2 and 3.
 
ideasrule said:
The energy of the particle can never be lower than the minimum potential energy. In other words, E+V_min > 0 for every stationary state.

Or did you mean E - V_min > 0 for every stationary state?

I am wondering why the energy of the particle can never be lower than the minimum potential energy.

Please help me out!
 
Try satisfying the boundary conditions in the second and third cases. You'll find you can't except when the wave function vanishes. Only the first case allows non-trivial solutions.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top