What Are the Potential Dangers of Nuclear Melt and Its After Effects?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sandon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Effects Nuclear
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the dangers of specific radioactive isotopes, focusing on their short and long-term impacts. I-131 is noted for its short half-life and non-reactivity with air, while Cs-137 and Sr-90 are significant long-term hazards due to their ability to form oxides with air and their aqueous solubility. Additional isotopes like Sr-89, Cs-134, Pm-147, Sm-151, and Kr-85 are mentioned, with varying half-lives and volatility, indicating potential risks. The volatility and solubility of these isotopes are crucial for understanding their environmental persistence and health risks. Overall, the key concerns revolve around the yield and half-life of these radionuclides in the environment.
sandon
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
Are there any other measurable danger other than the following


Short term (short half life)

I -131
Do not react with air
Forms aqueous solution with water


Long term (long half life)

Cs -137
Forms cesium oxide with air, can be carried away by air
Forms aqueous solution with water

Sr - 90
Forms strontium oxide with air, can carried away by air
Forms strontium nitride with air, can carried away by air
Forms aqueous solution with water


Not sure if there are any other major concerns
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fission_product_yield
there a few more significant isotopes

Sr-89 - half-life 50d
Cs-134 - 2 years
Pm-147 - 2.6 years (how volatile is it?)
Sm-151 - 90 years (how volatile is it?)
Kr-85 - 10 years (as a noble gas, it disperses quickly, doesn't stay in soils or living tissue)
 
Pm and Sm would preferentially form oxides, as do the other rare Earth's.

Cs is volatile, as is I, and Sr, is somewhat volatile and soluble.

Kr-85 is a gas, so it could more readily escape containment.The key is yield and half-life. The OP states the 3 key radionuclides since they are persistent in the environment.

See also - http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0410/ML041040063.pdf
 
Last edited:
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Back
Top