What are the rate equations for neutron capture on unstable nuclei B?

solidbastard
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Summary: Problem: nuclear physics, neutron capture

In the problem one should calculate time dependence of number of nuclei.

Problem statement:

Neutron beam radiates sample A with initial number of atoms N0. With neutron capture nuclei (cores) of A are transitioning to nuclei B (they are just one neutron richer isotope).

A + n → B + ϒ

Expected time for neutron capture on core is equal to τN. With an assumption that neutrons do not affect the sample B, calculate time dependence number of nuclei B if:

1. cores B are stable
2. cores B are unstable with average lifetime of τ0 and they decay to the nuclei (cores) different then A
3. cores B are unstable with average lifetime τ0 and they decay back to the nuclei (cores) A.

There are also two hints in helping problem to solve:
Hint 1:
Parameter τN considers that contribution to the destroying of nuclei A with neutron captures is described as:
##(\dfrac{dN_A}{dt})_{capture} = \dfrac{-N_A}{\tau_N}##

Hint 2:
Sometimes it is useful to assume solution in advance, but sometimes it is easier to switch to the new set of variables like:
##\Sigma = N_A+N_B## and ##\Delta = N_A-N_B##So, this is the problem. It is hard for me to actually attack it anyhow, because problem is generalized and what bothers me the most are conditions for 1, 2 an 3. On the other side, kind of confused with hint 2.
How should I treat here stable and unstable nuclei B. To just assume N/Z ratio, like even - even nuclei or similar. But the also to assume the same for nuclei A.
For any advice and help, thanks in advance!

[Moderator's note: Moved from a technical forum and thus no template.]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Then you just write down rate equations. For case (3)
$$\dot{N}_A=-\lambda_N N_A+\lambda_0 N_B,\\
\dot{N}_B=\lambda_N N_A -\lambda_0 N_B.$$
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top