What Are the Speeds of the Fragments After an Explosion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter StephenDoty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explosion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speeds of three fragments resulting from an explosion, given their mass ratios and the speed of one fragment. The problem emphasizes the conservation of momentum, noting that the total momentum before the explosion is zero, leading to a net momentum of zero after the explosion. Participants suggest breaking down the momentum into x and y components and using trigonometry to set up the equations. The equations for conservation of momentum are refined, and participants discuss how to solve for the speeds of the other two fragments, ultimately leading to a relationship between their velocities. The conversation concludes with guidance on substituting values to find the specific speeds of the fragments.
StephenDoty
Messages
261
Reaction score
0
Question: If a container explodes and breaks into three fragments that fly off 120 degrees apart from each other, with mass ratios 1 : 4: 2. If the first piece flies off with a speed of 6m/s what is the speed of the other two fragments. (All fragments are in the plane.)


I do not even know how to set up this problem. I know that the momentum before the explosion has to equal the momentum after the explosion. But there is no starting velocity of the container before the explosion.

I just need some help setting the problem up.

Thank you

Stephen
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assume that the speed of the container before the explosion was zero.
 
If there is no starting momentum before the explosion, then there will be no NET final momentum.
 
Maybe Stephen needs to be reminded that to utter the phrase "conservation of momentum" means that you have two equations: one equation consisting of all x-components, and one equation consisting of all y-components.
 
ok
so
0= m*6cos(theata) + 4m*Vxcos(theata) + 2m*Vxcos(theata)
0= m*6sin(theata) + 4m*Vysin(theata) + 2m*Vysin(theata)

But what would theata equal?
 
Draw a picture, break the momentums into x and y vectors as mikelepore said, and use trigonometry.
 
right
so the first mass would be at 120 degrees thus x=-6cos60 and y=6sin60 since 180 - 120 = 60
the second mass would be at 240 degrees thus x=-Vcos60 and y=-Vsin60 since 240-180= 60
the third mass would be at 360 degrees thus x=Vcos0 and y=Vsin0 since 360 is at zero.

Is this right?
 
thus the two equations are:
7mVfx= -3m-2Vxm + 2Vxm
7mVfy= 3sqrt(3)* m - 2*sqrt(3)*Vy*m + 0

Right?
The velocities could be:
0.9m/s and 3m/s
or
1m/s and 3m/s
or
1.5m/s and 09m/s
or
1.5m/s and 3m/s


would the velocities be 1.5m/s and 3m/s?
 
Last edited:
any help would be appreciated
 
  • #10
StephenDoty said:
so the first mass would be at 120 degrees thus x=-6cos60 and y=6sin60 since 180 - 120 = 60
the second mass would be at 240 degrees thus x=-Vcos60 and y=-Vsin60 since 240-180= 60
the third mass would be at 360 degrees thus x=Vcos0 and y=Vsin0 since 360 is at zero.
Good, but do not use the same letter (V) to stand for two different speeds. Call the speed of the second mass V and the speed of the third mass W (or whatever).

Now write your conservation of momentum equations and solve for V and W.
 
  • #11
Are the two equations:

0= -3m-2Vxm + 2Vxm
0= 3sqrt(3)* m - 2*sqrt(3)*Vy*m + 0
 
  • #12
StephenDoty said:
Are the two equations:

0= -3m-2Vxm + 2Vxm
0= 3sqrt(3)* m - 2*sqrt(3)*Vy*m + 0
Almost. Looks like you used Vx to stand for the speed of both mass 2 and mass 3 in that first equation. (Probably just a typo.) Correct that and you're good to go.
 
  • #13
ok so the equations are:
0= -3m-2Vxm + 2Wxm
0= 3sqrt(3)* m - 2*sqrt(3)*Vy*m + 0
so:
3m+2Vxm=2Wxm
or
3/2 +Vx=Wx

and

2sqrt(3)*m*Vy=3*sqrt(3)*m

Vy=(3*sqrt(3))/(2sqrt(3))


Now what?
 
  • #14
StephenDoty said:
ok so the equations are:
0= -3m-2Vxm + 2Wxm
0= 3sqrt(3)* m - 2*sqrt(3)*Vy*m + 0
There are only two speeds; call them V (mass 2) and W (mass 3). I'd write the equations as:

0= -3m -2Vm + 2Wm
0= 3sqrt(3)*m - 2*sqrt(3)*V*m + 0

Work from there and solve for V & W.
 
  • #15
OK so:
3/2 +V=W

V=(3*sqrt(3))/(2sqrt(3))


Now do I replace V in 3/2 + V = W so I would get a value for V and W?
 
  • #16
StephenDoty said:
OK so:
3/2 +V=W
Good.

V=(3*sqrt(3))/(2sqrt(3))
Simplify that expression for V.

Now do I replace V in 3/2 + V = W so I would get a value for V and W?
Sure. You already have the value for V. Plug that into get the value for W.
 
Back
Top