What are the steps for solving Maxwell's laws assignment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MrJunkpile
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Assignment Laws
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving an assignment related to Maxwell's laws, specifically addressing the calculation of electric flux through specific faces and the integration process required for parts of the assignment. The participant seeks clarification on whether to double integrate the electric field (E) with respect to x and z, and confirms that their calculations for parts 2 and 3 resulted in zero flux and satisfied Faraday's law. They express uncertainty regarding constants and the approach for parts 6 and 8, while also sharing their method for finding the wave number (k) using permeability and permittivity. Overall, the participant is looking for guidance and confirmation on their progress and methodology in tackling the assignment.
MrJunkpile
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
hello

here's the paper.

http://www.physics.utah.edu/~rprice/00_2220/collab10.pdf

for the first part am i right in assuming that E flux is present only through the LH faces?

and that i need to double integrate E first with respect to x from zero to L and then with respect to z fom 0 to H? and similarly for part 2?

or am I complicating myself?

for part 3 I did the line integrals summed them and got 0

from part 2 i found the Bflux to be 0 therefore its derivative which is part three is 0. that satisfies Faraday's law doesn't it? as for the constants' relationship I'm not sure.

part 5 i did similarly to part 3

part 6: I am not sure on this

part 7: i used k^2/w^2=(permeability of free space)(permittivity) to find k, Beta I haven't found yet but I'll figure it out.

Part 8: any pointers for this part I'll greatly appreciate. :biggrin:

any help and advice greatly appreciated :smile:

I'll be checking replies and posting more questions :redface:

If what I've done so far does not make any sense or I'm totally in the wrong direction be frank in letting me know. I don't mind :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:cry: :cry: :cry:
 
thanks.


..
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top