What Are the True and False Statements About Hydrogen Electron Transitions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xiphoid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atomic Chemistry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the true and false statements regarding hydrogen electron transitions from the 3rd excited state (n=4). It confirms that radiation is emitted in the Lyman, Balmer, and Paschen series, making the first statement true. The second statement is false since it emits radiation in the infrared region as well. The third statement is false because the smallest wavelength corresponds to transitions from n=∞ to n=1, not from n=3 to n=2. The fourth statement is also false, as the Pfund series involves transitions to n=5, not the highest frequency from the third excited state.
xiphoid
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The hydrogen electron de-excites from its 3rd excited state, which are the true and false statements for it.

1. It emits radiation giving lines in Lymann, Balmer, Paschen series
2. It emits radiation of only UV and Visible region and not Infrared region
3. It emits radiation of smallest wavelength giving Line in Lymann series
4. It will emit radiation of highest frequency giving line in pfund series.

Homework Equations


ΔE = Rh[1/Ri2 - 1/Rfs]

The Attempt at a Solution


Clearly, third excited state should mean that n=4.
So it will emit radiation in Lymann, Balmer, Paschen series, hence the statement should be true.
Then, as per the above mentioned sentence, it will emit radiation in Infrared region also, hence the statement should be false.
Smallest wavelength- will be when the difference in wavelength will be 1, eg. ni=3, and nf=2, if this is true, then the third statement will be true.
Highest frequency- when the difference is maximum, hence the last statement is false.

So, the answer should be TFTF.?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
3. Smallest wavelength=Highest Energy. For Lymann series, thus corresponds to electron jump from \infty \to 1, which is 91.2 nm. so the third statement is false.

4. This statement is false because for Pfund series, nf = 5.

Answer is TFFF.
 
yeah, got it! i was actually initially confused regarding that while typing, but now got it.

But while referring to the solution of this sum, they had considered the third excited state when n= 3, which i don't think is true, do you agree? it should be n=4
AGNuke said:
3. Smallest wavelength=Highest Energy. For Lymann series, thus corresponds to electron jump from \infty \to 1, which is 91.2 nm. so the third statement is false.

4. This statement is false because for Pfund series, nf = 5.

Answer is TFFF.
 
3rd excited state is n=4. The solution has some typo, as mostly, solutions are not typed by teachers, but professional typists, who go out of their way to "correct" them.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top