What are the two sides that contribute to the divergence theorem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter r19ecua
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gaussian Theorem
r19ecua
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose the one-dimensional field A = Kx * ax exists in a region. Illustrate the validity of the Gaussian theorem by evaluating its volume and surface integrals inside and on the rectangular parallelepiped bounded by the surfaces: x=1,x=4,y=2,y=-2,z=0 and z=3, for a given A.

Untitled.png


Homework Equations



(Right) \int_0^3\int_1^4xdxdz ay + (left) \int_0^3\int_1^4xdxdz -(ay) + (top) \int_{-2}^2\int_1^4xdxdy az + (bottom) \int_{-2}^2\int_1^4xdxdy -(az) + (front) \int_0^3\int_{-2}^2dydz (ax) + (back) \int_0^3\int_{-2}^2dydz -(ax)


Direction on the left is applied to the integral on its right.

The Attempt at a Solution



For the Right side
\int_0^3\int_1^4xdxdz ay
My answer to this integral is 45/2

For the left side
\int_0^3\int_1^4xdxdz -(ay)
My answer to this integral is -45/2

For the top side
\int_{-2}^2\int_1^4xdxdy az
My answer is 30

For the bottom
\int_{-2}^2\int_1^4xdxdy -(az)
-30

For the front
\int_0^3\int_{-2}^2dydz (ax)
36

For the back
\int_0^3\int_{-2}^2dydz -(ax)
-36

When I add these up, I get zero... however, when I use the divergence theorem I get 36.

This answer is suppose to equal the answer I get via the divergence theorem formula. I'm confused :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are only 2 sides that "see" the field A head-on. Mathematically, there are only two sides for which ∫A*ds ≠ 0 where ds is a vector element of area on any side. Which sides are those?

Now integrate A over those two sides, remembering that the dot-product A*ds will be positive for one side and negative for the other. In other words, the normal to any closed surface always points out of the surface.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top