What area does the flux formula refer to?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the flux formula in electromagnetic induction, specifically regarding the area considered in different scenarios. When a metal rod moves through a magnetic field, the area "swept out" is defined by the rod's length and the distance it travels. In contrast, when a bar magnet moves through a coil, the area referenced in the formula is the entire cross-sectional area of the coil, as it defines the boundary for magnetic flux. This distinction arises because the induced electric field relates to the total magnetic flux through the coil, not just the portion intersected by the wire. Understanding these differences is crucial for grasping the principles of electromagnetic induction.
koliko987
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I've been studying em induction and in my book it was explained by considering a metal rod of length l moving through a magnetic field and cutting through the field lines at a constant speed. So in time dt it moves through ds and they showed e=BA/dt, where A = l x ds(the area that the rod "sweeps out".
Then in the next chapter it explains induction when moving a bar magnet through a coil and this time the "A" in the formula referred to the area of the cross section of the coil (the circle area of one of the rings of the wound up wire). Why is this? The magnetic field lines are only cutting through the small area of the wire, the rest of the "circle" is empty space so why are we considering the whole area of the cross section. What's different now that we're not looking for area that the wire "sweeps out"?
Thank you for your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can study any surface you want.

I presume that this coil is not part of a circuit with a source.
In the case of a coil, there is interest in the magnetic-flux through the coil (that is, an area where the coil marks the boundary of that area). That flux will be related to the electric-field induced along that boundary.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top