What Can be Said About the Kernel of a Tensor Product of Linear Maps?

ihggin
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Suppose f_1 is a linear map between vector spaces V_1 and U_1, and f_2 is a linear map between vector spaces V_2 and U_2 (all vector spaces over F). Then f_1 \otimes f_2 is a linear transformation from V_1 \otimes_F V_2 to U_1 \otimes_F U_2. Is there any "nice" way that we can write the kernel of f_1 \otimes f_2 in terms of the kernels of f_1 and f_2? For example, is it true that f_1 and f_2 injective implies f_1 \otimes f_2 is injective?

I tried assuming f_1 \otimes f_2 acting on a general element \sum v_1 \otimes v_2 was zero, but the resulting tensor \sum f_1(v_1) \otimes f_2(v_2) is too complicated for me to draw implications for v_1 and v_2. It is obvious that v_1 \in \ker f_1 or v_2 \in \ker f_2 implies that the latter tensor product is 0, but what can be said for the other direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest to look at a simple case, when f and g are linear functionals on the same vector space. Then they are given by a pair of (dual) vectors, say v and w, and an element of the tensor product of vector space by itself is essentially a matrix, say A.
Then you will get something like

(f\otimes g)(A)=\langle v,Aw\rangle

What can you deduce in this simple case?

I hope my reasoning is roughly correct, but I was making just quick intuitive guesses.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top