What Causes a 1000 Times Weight Increase Without Overcoming Gravity?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the inability to lift a 1 kg iron object due to the overwhelming gravitational force compared to the magnetic force that can lift a 1 gram object. Participants clarify that comparing bulk materials is misleading, as various factors like material purity and temperature affect magnetic strength. They emphasize the importance of comparing forces at the atomic level, specifically between electrons, rather than at larger scales. The conversation also highlights that while electromagnetism is significantly stronger than gravity, its effects are less noticeable over large distances due to the neutrality of matter. Overall, the nuances of force comparisons reveal the complexities of understanding gravitational and electromagnetic interactions.
litteraround
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
not able to pick up a 1 kg iron object off the ground by overcoming the gravitational force between Earth and the object.

Consider this : It can pick up a 1 gram (iron) object easily. Then, the increase (from 1gm to 1 kg) would be by a 1000 times. Clearly that increase cannot account for the factorial difference of billions of times between electromagnetism and gravity. What gives?

I know, I am making a simple mistake in my thinking somewhere but can't really figure it out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You are misinterpreting the comparison. You can't compare bulk material, because a number of factors can affect the strength of the magnetic field (such as the purity of the material, and the temperature).

What you CAN do is compare the magnetic "force" between two electrons, and then compare the gravitational strength between them at the identical distance.

Zz.
 


Without realizing it you are mixing a bunch of different topics. First, Newtonian gravity and Coulomb's law are both inverse square laws, but an ideal magnet is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_moment#Magnetic_field_produced_by_a_magnetic_moment". Second, the difference in the mass of the Earth and the mass of your chunks of iron is much more than a factor of "billions". Third, you are comparing magnetism at a distance of a few inches to gravity at a distance of thousands of kilometers (assuming an ideal spherical earth).

The first point is probably the most important for your practical experiment. If you placed your 1 gram object at the same distance from the magnet as the far side of your 1 kg object it probably would not lift even the 1 gram object.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmSyJSSuFpM&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHXpZpcMLTA&feature=related

To expand a bit on DaleSpam's and Zz's posts, consider the analogy of picking up a small piece of neutral paper with a charged comb. The charged comb induces a tiny polarization on the neutral paper that allows you to pick it up. You won't be able to pick up a stack of papers because the tiny polarization remains the same.

A key thing is that the piece of paper itself is neutral, and the comb only induces the charge. It is different for objects with net charge. If a comb can pick up a small object with 1 net charge, it can pick up an object 1000 as big with 1000 net charges. For electromagnetism, there are positive and negative charges which cancel each other out to a very high precision (a tiny grain of salt is neutral, even though it has gazillions of charges). For gravity, there is no opposite charge, and so even though it is weak, it builds up over large distance. The neutrality of matter is why even though the electromagnetic force is much stronger than gravity, it tends not to be apparent at large distances.
 


Thanx guys, I think I am getting it. But, if anyone wants to add something, it'd be great.
 
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
Back
Top