B What causes orbits to be inclined?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dreksler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inclined Orbits
AI Thread Summary
Orbits can deviate from zero degrees relative to the equatorial plane due to various factors, primarily the initial conditions of the solar system's formation from a rotating gaseous cloud. As planets coalesce, gravitational interactions and collisions can cause slight inclinations, resulting in the observed single-digit inclinations of the planets relative to each other. Moons, however, often form or are captured after their parent planets have already coalesced, leading to different dynamics in their orbital inclinations. The conservation of angular momentum plays a crucial role, as the three-dimensional nature of the original nebula influences the final arrangement of celestial bodies. Overall, while the current solar system is stable, significant events like large planetary collisions could drastically alter orbital planes.
Dreksler
Messages
14
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
Or what are the characteristics that generally predict inclined orbits?
I want to know what are generally the characteristics that can predict or things that could cause the orbit of an object to deviate from zero degrees relative to the equatorial plane of the object that it is orbiting?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
To start with, at the time the solar system is formed, it is one cloud with a net rotational momentum and for a few reasons tends to coalesce into a disc. So that's the starting point of your expectation. But nothing is perfect, and the planets interact most notably with each other, which causes them to move from perfect alignment. But not much; all of the [currently defined] planets are within single digit inclinations of each other.
 
  • Like
Likes Dreksler
russ_watters said:
single digit inclinations
I guess you mean single digits of degrees (from the ecliptic plane?).
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
Keith_McClary said:
I guess you mean single digits of degrees (from the ecliptic plane?).
Yep, skipped a key word.
 
Dreksler said:
...deviate from zero degrees relative to the equatorial plane of the object that it is orbiting?
So, to tease this apart a little:

Are you thinking about how planets might have aligned in the plane of their parent star? Or are you thinking more about how moons might have aligned in the rotational planes of their parent planet? (not to mention comets and asteroids).

Because I think there's some nuances in how the initial conditions evolve to the observed conditions.

Example:
Planets evolve from a vaguely spherical, rotating gaseous cloud of a proto-solar system on a broadly similar timeline as the sun itself coalesces.

But moons are not necessarily analogous - they do not likewise evolve from a vaguely rotating spherical gaseous cloud of a proto-planetoid, coalescing at the same time.

There's a lot of moons that get their orbits long after their parent planets have coalesced. Some captures, some impact ejections, etc. These have no analogue for planets.

Apples and oranges, you see.
 
  • Like
Likes Dreksler
The original nebula, assuming it contains all the material of a future solar system, will be very much three dimensional. It will have a certain net angular momentum., which will remain constant. There will be an axis for this angular momentum. As gravity draws the material together, momentum will always be conserved but the kinetic energy won't be. That will cause objects to form and grow. The central star will get most of the material but there will also be planets and dust clouds. the mass will be near a single plane but only near. Any collisions can have the effect of knocking the objects out of the plane. The present arrangement of the solar system is fairly stable (in our time scale) but, if two large planets were to collide, the results could be way outside the plane of the ecliptic. This would require more than just the two colliding planets.
 
  • Like
Likes Dreksler
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top