What Causes the Unique Shadows and Light Effects of Water Striders?

AI Thread Summary
The large shadows cast by the legs of water striders are likely due to water adhering to their legs, creating a "jacket" that alters light refraction. This phenomenon may also be influenced by the deformation of water at the contact points, acting like a lens that redirects light. The bright ring around the shadows results from this light deflection, creating both dark and bright spots. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding refraction in explaining these unique visual effects. Overall, the interaction between the water strider's legs and the water surface is key to these optical phenomena.
zachcumer
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
What accounts for the large shadows cast by the ends of the thin legs of the water strider? What accounts for the ring of bright light around the shadows?

Here is my picture (below) (ATTACHED)
 

Attachments

  • 36709.jpeg
    36709.jpeg
    6.7 KB · Views: 514
Physics news on Phys.org
Bell bottoms?

Actually, I can't see your picture (not approved yet), but I'd guess that some water climbs up the strider's legs, due to surface tension in the water, so there's a "jacket" of water on them. Or, maybe it's an optical effect due to the deformation of the water where the strider's legs contact the surface. It could act like a lens, which would explain the deflection of light so that you get dark spots (from where light was redirected) and brights spots (to where the light was redirected). I'm just guessing, though, since I haven't seen the picture ... of course, I could still be guessing even then!
 
I believe the last thing you mentioned. "LENS"...is what my teacher is looking for. I just brushed up my reading and in the book, they talk a ton about lenses.
 
Thanks Belliott
 
Yup - if you're searching for key words, try "refraction"!
 
Again...very helpful..thanks man.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

B A friend of mine sent me these pictures showing multiple shadows
Replies
4
Views
1K
Why does flowing water cast a shadow?
Replies
10
Views
5K
How Does Refraction Influence Measurement Accuracy in Ripple Tank Experiments?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Completely black shadow cast through perfectly clear water.
Replies
4
Views
3K
Light Phenomena - shadows within shadows
Replies
21
Views
12K
Light refraction problem in water & air
Replies
4
Views
8K
What does it mean that when light is reflected the "wavelengths of each contributing hue are subtracted"?
Replies
16
Views
1K
Formula derivation connecting vertical water flowrate & horizontal distance moved by a suspended sphere
5
Replies
207
Views
8K
Force of water against a dam gate
Replies
29
Views
3K
Photo Contest - Me And My Shadow (5/19-5/25)
Replies
10
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top