What color clothing is safest during a nuclear explosion?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the question of which color clothing would be safest to wear during a nuclear explosion, particularly in terms of exposure to radiant energy. Participants explore various aspects of clothing color, thermal effects, and visibility in the context of a nuclear event.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that white clothing is generally better for reflecting radiant energy, while black clothing may absorb more energy and potentially cause burns.
  • One participant notes that the color of clothing may be less critical compared to the overall protective qualities of the fabric against thermal radiation and shock.
  • Another viewpoint emphasizes that high-energy photons do not interact with clothing color, suggesting that the color's impact is limited to visible light.
  • Some responses highlight the importance of visibility for rescue efforts, proposing that neon colors could be advantageous for being spotted in debris.
  • Several participants reference historical accounts of burns on victims from Hiroshima, suggesting that the thermal effects of a nuclear explosion may render clothing color less significant.
  • There are humorous and sarcastic remarks about the absurdity of the question, comparing it to other hypothetical scenarios that highlight the impracticality of focusing on clothing color in such extreme situations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions, with no clear consensus on the best clothing color. Some argue for white based on reflectivity, while others contend that color is largely irrelevant in the context of a nuclear explosion. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the discussion is highly theoretical and that many variables affect safety during a nuclear explosion, including the type of radiation and the distance from the blast. The focus on clothing color is seen as a narrow aspect of a much larger issue.

dav2008
Gold Member
Messages
588
Reaction score
1
All else being equal, which color clothing would be best if you are exposed to a nuclear explosion (far enough away where you're not instantly killed, but still subjected to significant radiant energy)? Black or white?

It seems like black clothing would get hotter and could thus burn you by contact, but would it also absorb more radiant energy (e.g. high energy photons) and thus protect your skin better?

(I wasn't sure which forum this would belong in so feel free to move to the appropriate one)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
My wife's suggestion: 'anything that hides the brown stains.'
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Borg, davidbenari, Greg Bernhardt and 3 others
Setting aside the whole 'what do you wear to a nuclear explosion?' amusement, the generally best clothing to resist EMR is white.

Well, barring silver foil, of course. But next to silver, white is the most reflective.
 
High-energetic photons won't care about the color of your clothes. Color is a reaction to visible light. All other things being equal, reflecting more of this light is certainly useful -> white.
 
I remember reading that some Hiroshima victims had the pattern of their clothes burned into their skin.
So an all white sheet is probably the best thing to wear, plus it simplifies the funeral arrangements.
Do note that the thermal pulse from a thermonuclear device is enormously greater and lasts much longer, so the color of the garments is probably immaterial. Witnesses to the Pacific test series reported sea birds bursting into flames in mid air, some miles from the explosion.
 
Any clothing that can protect you from intensive thermal radiation/shock will help. Color of the suit isn't critical. Here is a typical suit for electricians:
http://www.electricityforum.com/arc-flash/images/arc-flash-clothing.jpg

Unfortunatelly, such clothing won't be enough to shield you from powerful ionizing radiation (gamma rays, protons, neutrons etc.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are clothes with lead to shield x-rays. They don't absorb all gamma rays, but they would still give protection. Especially with multiple layers, they'll also provide some protection against the shock.
 
bright orange or yellow - you'll die for sure anyway, but you body will be easier to spot and be burnt as rottening radiactive waste. otherwise, you can also put on something very flammable, so, you'll go though all of it faster and reduce decontaminators' work.
 
The color won't matter much but a nice thick wool coat with full biker leathers would be my fashion choice.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: billy_joule
  • #10
Lead is gray, so I'd say the best color to wear is gray.
 
  • #11
And let's not forget to duck and cover!
 
  • #12
zoki85 said:
Any clothing that can protect you from intensive thermal radiation/shock will help. Color of the suit isn't critical. Here is a typical suit for electricians:
http://www.electricityforum.com/arc-flash/images/arc-flash-clothing.jpg

Unfortunatelly, such clothing won't be enough to shield you from powerful ionizing radiation (gamma rays, protons, neutrons etc.)

Electricians?? o_O
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
berkeman said:
Electricians?? o_O
Special kinds of electricians:), working in vicinity of medium voltage live circuits where arc flash hazard is deadly in radius like 10 feet
 
  • #14
All very interesting answers, but...

I'd reiterate the user's specification that "...all other things being equal..."

i.e. he knows that there are lots of variants on protecting onesself. Those variants aside, he's interested specifically in colour.

Though frankly I still can't imagine why.

It's like saying:

'All other things being equal, which is the most aerodynamic position to hold your hand in, if you stick it out the window of an airliner doing 500mph at 40,000 feet?'

'All other things being equal, what is the best scent to be wearing to discourage the rabid grizzly that is currently savaging your head?'

'All other things being equal, which species of whelk stands a better chance in a supernova?'
 
Last edited:
  • #15
The house in the middle:


A clean white house is the key.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vela and Drakkith
  • #16
I think a neon color would be best. Not because it will reflect more light, but because there is so much energy in a nuclear explosion from EMR that the color of your shirt probably won't matter much. However, if your shirt is a neon color, you'll stand out from the dust and rubble and it will be easier for a rescue crew to find you. Unless you're very close to ground zero (in which case your shirt will evaporate along with the rest of you), it's going to be collapsing buildings and falling debris that threaten you much more than radiation or heat, so prompt medical attention is going to be important.
 
  • #17
In that vase, the best thing to wear would be a helium balloon on a 20 foot string.
 
  • #18
dav2008 said:
All else being equal, which color clothing would be best if you are exposed to a nuclear explosion (far enough away where you're not instantly killed, but still subjected to significant radiant energy)? Black or white?

It seems like black clothing would get hotter and could thus burn you by contact, but would it also absorb more radiant energy (e.g. high energy photons) and thus protect your skin better?

Your question, and the responses you received, such as this:
DaveC426913 said:
My wife's suggestion: 'anything that hides the brown stains.'

... is what has me joining this forum. Congratulations. I *thought* for a moment you'd not received an actual answer, but I think mfb captures it:
mfb said:
All other things being equal, reflecting more of this light is certainly useful -> white.

If you wore black, you're right, it would absorb the light, but then your t-shirt would probably burst into flames or at least give you a nice contact hig... er, contact burns. But, mfb also hits the nail on the head that visible and IR light are small components of the energy release of a thermonuclear event, which releases far more in gamma radiation, plus those pesky extremely energised alpha and beta particles all of which will not give a tutti-fruiti dang what colour t-shirt you're wearing. Hello, thyroid cancer!
etudiant said:
Witnesses to the Pacific test series reported sea birds bursting into flames in mid air, some miles from the explosion.

Is it wrong that this make me gaffaw out loud?
Fascinating answers everyone.
 
  • #19
@nsaspook
LMAO I forgot those old civil defense Vids were so funny.

watch both houses! the roofs are partially blown off but only one burns... never mind you've received a most likely fatal amount of radiation poisoning but your house did not burn down...


wounder if the guy's seen checking the aftermath without protective suites had Geiger counters supplied to them before they went in?
 
  • #20
DaveC426913 said:
It's like saying:

'All other things being equal, which is the most aerodynamic position to hold your hand in, if you stick it out the window of an airliner doing 500mph at 40,000 feet?'

'All other things being equal, what is the best scent to be wearing to discourage the rabid grizzly that is currently savaging your head?'

'All other things being equal, which species of whelk stands a better chance in a supernova?'
Or "All other things being equal, what brand of bottled water is safest to drown in?"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dragoneyes001
  • #21
"All other things being equal, from a parachute failure at 8,000 feet, what type of concrete is the softest on impact?"
 
  • #22
DaveC426913 said:
"All other things being equal, from a parachute failure at 8,000 feet, what type of concrete is the softest on impact?"
Oh. oh! I can answer this! the uncured, non-reinforced concrete! would make an instant Mausoleum
 
  • #23
etudiant said:
I remember reading that some Hiroshima victims had the pattern of their clothes burned into their skin.
So an all white sheet is probably the best thing to wear, plus it simplifies the funeral arrangements.
Do note that the thermal pulse from a thermonuclear device is enormously greater and lasts much longer, so the color of the garments is probably immaterial. Witnesses to the Pacific test series reported sea birds bursting into flames in mid air, some miles from the explosion.

I read about the pattern of people's clothes being burned into their skin, as well.

My conclusion is slightly different, though.

I'd wear this T-shirt:

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR17hOliE4u1lKJJFMArZNAF-2LBvc3U9DiiE8WNYOrXnlzQnfh.jpg
 
  • #24
I just shake my head every time this featured thread shows up at the top of my page. After all, what good is the color of your clothing if you aren't wearing 2 million SPF sun block to go with it? :oldconfused:
 
  • #25
^ must agree with Borg
 
  • #26
So that you stand out from the hoi polloi when the first Army helicopters arrive to survey the scene, I think you should wear coveralls of fluro pink, emblazoned in large letters "PLUMBER-GASFITTER-ELECTRICIAN", because we know the army gives priority to qualified tradesmen! :)
 
  • #27
Same color as the launch crew.
 
  • #28
I also thought a dirt color would be optimal. Perhaps 3-4 feet of it between me and whatever. Perhaps with layer of white Borox to capture neutrons.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
24K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
11K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
23K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K