What combinations satisfy this complex exponentiation property?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bruno67
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
bruno67
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Suppose we have the product

[(\pm ia) (\pm ib)]^{-\alpha}
wherea, b, \alpha >0. For which of the combinations (+,+), (+,-), (-,+), and (-,-) is the following property satisfied?

[(\pm ia) (\pm ib)]^{-\alpha}=(\pm ia)^{-\alpha} (\pm ib)^{-\alpha}
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Bruno67! :smile:

Using the definition of exponentiation we have that

[(\pm ia)(pm ib)]^{-\alpha}=e^{-\alpha Log((\pm ia)(\pm ib))}

So the question becomes when

Log((\pm ia)(\pm ib))=Log(\pm ia)+Log(\pm ib)

Solve this using the definition of the logarithm.
 
Thanks, so it holds in all cases except the (-,-) one. In that case we have

[(-ia) (-ib)]^\alpha = (-ia)^\alpha (-ib)^\alpha (-1)^{2\alpha}.
 
Indeed!:smile:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top