What could be causing the discrepancy in the angle calculation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kenewbie
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on discrepancies in calculating the parametric representations of two planes defined by points A, B, C, and D, as well as the angle between them. The user initially struggles with their representations, believing they are incorrect, but is reassured that different parameterizations can describe the same plane. It is emphasized that using different variables for each plane's parameters is crucial to avoid confusion. The user also calculates the angle between the planes using cross products but arrives at a different result than the book, prompting further verification of their calculations. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of understanding parameterization and vector operations in geometry.
kenewbie
Messages
238
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This should be simple, but I can't figure out what I did wrong.

A(1,2,1)
B(1,1,3)
C(-1,1,-1)
D(1,-2,1)

a) Give a "parametric representation" of the plane a which goes through the points A, B and C.
b) Give a "parametric representation" of the plane b which goes through the points B, C and D.
c) Give a representation of the line which describe the intersection between the planes a and b.
d) Calculate the angle between planes a and b.

I'm not sure if the term "parametric representation" looses meaning in translation, but the idea is to give a formula using 2 variables so that all values give describe a point on the plane.

The Attempt at a Solution



a)

Vector AB = [ 0, -1, 2 ]
Vector AC = [ -2, -1, -2 ]

Using point A with vectors AB and AC I get the following representation of the plane:

x = 1 - 2t
y = 2 - s - t
z = 1 + 2s - 2t

But my book says the plane is supposed to be

x = 1 + 2t
y = 2 - s + t
z = 1 + 2s + 2t

This seems to be using vectors AB and CA along with the point A. Why would they use CA? Do I describe the same plane as the book?

b)

Using the point B and vectors BC and BD, i get:

x = 1 - 2s
y = 1 - 3t
z = 3 - 4s -2t

which again is different from the answer in my book, which is

x = 1 + s
y = 1 + 3t
z = 3 + 2s + 2t

c)

I would try to set the x-value of plane a equal to the x-value plane b and so forth, and see what values of t and s that solves for, but since my plane-representations are wrong I get bogus values.

d)

using AB x AC as the normal for plane a and BC x BD as the normal for plane b I get an angle of 43.5 between the planes. My book says 58.4

All help appreciated.

k
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kenewbie said:

Homework Statement



This should be simple, but I can't figure out what I did wrong.

A(1,2,1)
B(1,1,3)
C(-1,1,-1)
D(1,-2,1)

a) Give a "parametric representation" of the plane a which goes through the points A, B and C.
b) Give a "parametric representation" of the plane b which goes through the points B, C and D.
c) Give a representation of the line which describe the intersection between the planes a and b.
d) Calculate the angle between planes a and b.

I'm not sure if the term "parametric representation" looses meaning in translation, but the idea is to give a formula using 2 variables so that all values give describe a point on the plane.

The Attempt at a Solution



a)

Vector AB = [ 0, -1, 2 ]
Vector AC = [ -2, -1, -2 ]

Using point A with vectors AB and AC I get the following representation of the plane:

x = 1 - 2t
y = 2 - s - t
z = 1 + 2s - 2t

But my book says the plane is supposed to be

x = 1 + 2t
y = 2 - s + t
z = 1 + 2s + 2t

This seems to be using vectors AB and CA along with the point A. Why would they use CA? Do I describe the same plane as the book?
Yes, of course. The fact that the three given points satisfy both sets of equations tells you they are the same plane. They are just using a different parameter. Their "t" is the negative of yours. And there is no reason not to use CA rather than AC. Both are vectors in the plane and that is all that is required.

b)

Using the point B and vectors BC and BD, i get:

x = 1 - 2s
y = 1 - 3t
z = 3 - 4s -2t

which again is different from the answer in my book, which is

x = 1 + s
y = 1 + 3t
z = 3 + 2s + 2t
Again, just a different paremeterization. Here, their "s" is -2 times yours and their "t" is the negative of yours.

c)

I would try to set the x-value of plane a equal to the x-value plane b and so forth, and see what values of t and s that solves for, but since my plane-representations are wrong I get bogus values.
No, your equations are NOT wrong. One thing you have to be careful to do is to recognize the the "s" and "t" in each of your sets of equations may represent different things- don't use the same name when solving them together.

You have
x = 1 - 2t
y = 2 - s - t
z = 1 + 2s - 2t
and
x = 1 - 2a
y = 1 - 3b
z = 3 - 4a -2b

where, for the second equation, I have replaced "s" and "t" by "a'" and "b'" to distinguish them.

d)

using AB x AC as the normal for plane a and BC x BD as the normal for plane b I get an angle of 43.5 between the planes. My book says 58.4
No reason why that shouldn't work. Show your work and we will try to check it.

All help appreciated.

k
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, of course. The fact that the three given points satisfy both sets of equations tells you they are the same plane. They are just using a different parameter. Their "t" is the negative of yours. And there is no reason not to use CA rather than AC. Both are vectors in the plane and that is all that is required.

Ok, good. I started thinking there might be some "right-handed system" issue here that I didn't understand.

HallsofIvy said:
No, your equations are NOT wrong. One thing you have to be careful to do is to recognize the the "s" and "t" in each of your sets of equations may represent different things- don't use the same name when solving them together.

Aaah, see, I used "t" and "s" for both of them, that is why I got nonsense then. What you are saying makes sense. Since both parameterizations use different points on the plain and different vectors, they will point to different parts of the plane given the same values as paramters! Thanks.

As for the angle, this is my work (slightly abbreviated)

AB x AC = [0, -1, 2] x [-2, -1, -2] = [4, -4, -2]
BC x BD = [-2, 0, -4] x [0, -3, -2] = [12, -8, 6]

(AB x AC) * (BC x BD) = [4, -4, -2] * [12, -8, 6] = 68

|AB x AC| = 6
|BC x BD| = sqrt(244)

so, the angle = inv cos( 68 / ( 6 sqrt(244) ) ) = 43.5

My book says 58.4

k
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top