What criteria determine the type of mathematical operator used in a formula?

  • Thread starter Thread starter electrous
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Criteria
electrous
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
we have ,
W=F(m)
here W is function of m
how do we define the fuction f as only as multiplication if this formula represent weight of the body. is there any criteria for mathmatical oprators to be addition, subtraction , multiplecation or division pleasezz explian.. :cry:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, weight is a vector, and the operation with m (where m is mass, which is a scalar) is m * g, where g is the local acceleration due to gravity, a vector. Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division (+, -, *, /) are dyadic operators which 'operate or provide a relationship between 'two' operands.

Please refer to -
http://www.maxonline.lsu.edu/pages/MFguide/Algebraic/Algebraic.pdf
 
in equatiion W=f(m), the function can be successfully expressed as +ve, -ve, multiplicion and its inverse, then my question is why we consider function f as multipliction and why not others.
your reply about "how to know ", I like it.
sir if we consider the function as +ve , we get a new value of f which will satisfy all conditions , this will have happen in all cases.
I want , I think there must be a criteria,to know about it.
 
electrous said:
we have ,
W=F(m)
here W is function of m
how do we define the fuction f as only as multiplication if this formula represent weight of the body. is there any criteria for mathmatical oprators to be addition, subtraction , multiplecation or division pleasezz explian.. :cry:

I don't think we can explain, as the question doesn't make any sense.
 
matt grime said:
I don't think we can explain, as the question doesn't make any sense.

My best guess is confusion between the implicit multiplication (x)(y) and the functional notation f(x). :confused:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top