What Determines the Acceleration of a 25 kg Block in a Pulley System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thefox14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blocks Pulleys
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the acceleration of a 25 kg block in a pulley system involving three masses (10 kg, 15 kg, and 25 kg) with no friction and massless pulleys. Participants emphasize the importance of drawing free-body diagrams and understanding the relationship between tensions in the strings, specifically that the tensions in the strings supporting the 10 kg and 15 kg blocks are equal and half that of the tension in the string supporting the 25 kg block. The acceleration of the 25 kg block is derived from the relationship a3 = -(a1 + a2)/2, which reflects the system's dynamics when the blocks are released. Some users share their calculations and seek clarification on the derivation of acceleration, while others confirm the correctness of their solutions. The key takeaway is the application of Newton's laws to solve for the acceleration in this complex pulley system.
Thefox14
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]https://wug-s.physics.uiuc.edu/cgi/courses/shell/common/showme.pl?cc/DuPage/phys2111/fall/homework/Ch-05-Newtons-Laws/blocks_on_pulleys/12.gif

In the above picture, the masses are M1 = 10 kg, M2 = 15 kg, and M3 = 25 kg. The pulleys and strings are massless, there is no friction, and gravity points downward. The whole system is held fixed, then released at rest. What is the acceleration of the 25 kg block? Enter a positive answer if it goes up, a negative answer if it goes down, or 0 if the acceleration is zero.

Hint 1) Draw a free-body diagram for each of the three masses. Try to convince yourself that the tension in the strings supporting M1 and M2 are equal, and that tension is half of the tension in the string supporting M3.

Hint 2) Let's define the directions of all accelerations to be positive if they are up, negative if they are down. Consider the accelerations of the three blocks (a1, a2, and a3). The basic result is that a3 = -(a1 + a2)/2. How can we convince ourselves of that? This is not easy to derive, but we can make it plausible. Consider what happens if M1 = M2. Then we know that those two blocks will accelerate together just as though they were a single mass. They are essentially one half of a simple Atwood's machine, the other half of which is Block 3. Under those conditions, a1 = a2 and they are both equal to -a3. The negative sign arises because if Block 3 goes down, then the other two blocks must go up (and vice versa). This is exactly what our formula gives. In the general case, the formula is still valid. Using this information plus the hint about the tensions plus writing F = ma for each mass, we end up with 3 equations and 3 unknowns (1 tension and 2 accelerations). Solve these to find the answer. At this point the algebra gets a little messy, and it is better to plug the masses into the equations right away rather than keeping things algebraic.

Homework Equations


F = ma for each block

The Attempt at a Solution


I set up free body diagrams for each block and found:
(FT1 relates to the tension force for block 1 etc...)
FT1 = 10(g + a1)
FT2 = 15(g + a2)
FT3 = 25(g + a3)

I agree that FT1 = FT2 but I don't know why they are half the tension in FT3 or that their accelerations are a3 = -(a1 + a2)/2. Could someone please explain this a bit better than they did?

Also, just by using the hints/formulas they gave me I solved for a3 to be .2087 but this isn't the right answer. So I must be doing something wrong.

All help would be greatly appreciated
-Fox
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The pulley connecting them also obeys F=ma. It is accelerating but massless so the net force on it must be zero.

Also since the other pulley is fixed the acceleration of that pulley will be equal and opposite in sign to the acceleration of the third mass. Its height will be the average height of the first two masses (plus half the length of the string which is constant) so then to is its velocity and acceleration. Hence a3 = - (a1+a2)/2.

I just worked the problem and got something different from you. Double check your work.
 
Thanks! got the right answer. The real key for me was applying F = MA to that knot and a3 = -(a1+a2)/2

I was able to prove that the tension is 1/2 of that in F3, but I'm still having trouble proving the acceleration one. Could you help me get started in proving that as well (if you don't mind could you call the pulley connecting the three masses pulley 1 and the other pulley 2? I'm getting a bit confused by which pulley you were referencing)? I really like to understand all of the equations I use.

Thanks again!
 
If you don't mind I'd call positive a downward acceleration.

By the superposition of effect on M_1, M_2
we write that
a_2= g\frac{M_1-M_2}{M_1+M_2}

and of course a_2 = - a_1

So we have that
F_2 = M_2(g+a_2)
F_1 = M_1(g-a_2)

The force pulling down the left pulley is
since F_{12} = F_1 + F_2

But
F_{12} = g( M_1+M_2 - \frac{(M_1-M_2)^2}{M_1+M_2} ) = g \frac{4M_1M_2}{M_1+M_2}

That also gives you the "virtual mass" of the moving system of M1 and M2.
Their mass is:
\frac{4M_1M_2}{M_1+M_2}

Now if you make the same reasoning on the principal pulley we got the nice expression:

a_3 = g \frac{M_3-\frac{4M_1M_2}{M_1+M_2}}{M_3+\frac{4M_1M_2}{M_1+M_2}}
or, simpifying

a_3 = g \frac{M_1M_3+M_2M_3-4M_1M_2}{M_1M_3+M_2M_3+4M_1M_2}

Plug in the masses and got the acceleration of 3.

Play with the final formula.
What if M1 = 0 ?
What if M1=M2 ?
What if M3 = 2*M1 = 2*M2 ?
Imagine the pulley moving while masses go up and down.
Try make real experiments as long as it is possible with short time and money.
Have fun.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top