What Determines the Force of a Water Jet on Different Surfaces?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the impact of water jet deflection angles on the force exerted on different surfaces, specifically a flat plate and a hemispherical cup. The theoretical force equation, F_t = \dot{m}V(1-cos β), highlights that the angle of deflection (β) significantly influences the force applied by the water. For the flat plate, water deflects at 90 degrees, resulting in no horizontal force, while the cup redirects water at 180 degrees, creating an additional horizontal force component. This distinction explains why the cup experiences a greater force; it not only resists the incoming water but also reacts to the redirected stream. The conversation concludes by affirming the clarity of the explanation regarding the different behaviors of the surfaces.
wahaj
Messages
154
Reaction score
2
To experiment with conservation of linear momentum I did lab where a jet of water is shot at a flat plate and a hemispherical cup. After simplification the final equation for the theoretical force came out to be
F_t= \dot{m}V(1-cos \beta)
where \dot{m} is the mass flow rate of water and V is the velocity of water hitting the surface. \beta is the angle at which the water deflects off of the surface. For the flat plate is was 90 and for the cup it was 180. I have a hard time physically interpreting how the angle of deflection determines the force of the water. In both cases the same amount of water is hitting both surfaces with the same velocity at the same angle (which would be vertically upwards in this case). So why does the angle of deflection determine the force applied by the water?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Take a look at the structure of that equation. What happens when Beta is 90 degrees? What happens when it is 180?

Think of this equation as a sum of forces (as that's what it is). The plate resists the force imparted by the incoming water stream and the water is deflected 90 degrees (no horizontal force, since there's no horizontal component to the stream). So, after the water is deflected, there's no additional force for the plate to resist.

With the cup, the surface must first resist the stream (m_dot*V_initial) and then experiences an equal and opposite reaction from the horizontal component of redirected water stream.
 
When the math and intuition agree you are probably getting someplace. At least it's easier to remember the equation when they agree... Nice job there T_K.

Simply put - the plate just stops the water but the cup throws it back.
Imagine a similar experiment measurement with a baseball. Try it yourself in a rocking chair.
 
Excellent explanation, both of you. Thanks you very much for clearing this up for me.
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top