What Determines the Speed of a Spacecraft in Special Relativity?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding how a spacecraft's speed, such as 0.6c, is determined in the context of special relativity. It highlights that the speedometer reading reflects the spacecraft's velocity relative to an observer, while also noting that the surrounding environment experiences length contraction. The Lorentz Velocity Transform is referenced to explain how velocities are perceived differently in varying frames of reference. Additionally, it emphasizes the need to consider time dilation when calculating speed relative to surroundings. Overall, the conversation clarifies the complexities of measuring speed in relativistic contexts.
Delzac
Messages
389
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Usually in physics problem on special relativity, the state that this particular spaceship is traveling at, say, 0.6c.

Question is, where does this 0.6c come from? If the speedometer in the cockpit reads 0.6c, does it mean that the observer will look and think that it is traveling at 0.6 c?

I suppose spacecraft determines its speed with reference to its surrounding, that's how we all determine your own speed isn't it? From a 1meter mark to another, how long did it take. Craft determines its speed via this method, the environment outside would length contract wouldn't it? So is the velocity from the 2 different frame the same?

Lorentz Velocity Transform tells me that it would, cause,

u'_x = 0

Any ideas? Any help will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If we say a craft is moving at .6c, that will be relative to the observer.
If the occupant wished to know what his speed was relative to his surroundings, he would have to take into account that his surroundings will be compressed in the direction of his travel. He's also have to take into account time dilation.
 
Okay thanks, got it.
 
Delzac said:
Okay thanks, got it.

Really? No argument?

I think PF is going to explode.
 
Anomalies sometimes do surface.

Or why not take it that you have done a wonderful work explaining the concept to me.^^
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top