What do I see if I was a particle at speed moving by a spaceship?

fbs7
Messages
345
Reaction score
37
Say I became a particle and I'm moving at 0.9c towards a spaceship. My course is parallel to the ship, and I'm seeing it bow first.

So the entire ship is initially in front of me, seems quite short and is highly blue-shifted, right? So any crew would seem to be quite blue and is moving around really fast. Also say I can see one clock at the bow, another at the stern, and both show the same time.

Then as I move past its bow, the bow of the starship moves to my back and becomes red-shifted, so any crew member in the bow now became redder and is much slower; yet, the stern is still blue-shifted, and the crew members there are still moving around like crazy. Eventually I move past the whole ship and everything is now red-shifted and everybody is moving about much slower.

So is that right? That's how I should see it?

If so, here's the part I'm stuck: the whole spaceship is in one reference frame (that's moving past me at speed), so the time-dilatation effects should be the same for the whole ship... how come the ship shows at one point in time two different time-dilatation effects - one for the red-shifted bow, and another for the blue-shifted stern?

Also, because I saw the clock at the stern blue-shifted more time than the one in the bow, it should show a time slightly ahead as the one in the bow... but that doesn't seem correct at all, as initially both clocks seemed to have the same time, now that I'm past they seem to have different times...

Any help, please?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In Special Relativity, you always have to make a distinction between what an observer sees and what is actually happening according to a specified frame of reference. This is because what you can see is affected by the propagation of light which adds delay and so makes things appear later than the frame says they are. And, because of the relative motion, this delay can be decreasing (blue shifted) or increasing (red shifted). This effect is called Relativistic Doppler. So this explains the effects that you have described.
 
If so, here's the part I'm stuck: the whole spaceship is in one reference frame (that's moving past me at speed), so the time-dilatation effects should be the same for the whole ship...

It is. From the reference frame of the ship.

But you are in a reference frame which is changing with regards to the spaceship frame. Time dilation effects are relative to your frame.
 
ghwellsjr said:
In Special Relativity, you always have to make a distinction between what an observer sees and what is actually happening according to a specified frame of reference. This is because what you can see is affected by the propagation of light which adds delay and so makes things appear later than the frame says they are. And, because of the relative motion, this delay can be decreasing (blue shifted) or increasing (red shifted). This effect is called Relativistic Doppler. So this explains the effects that you have described.


That's awesome... so if a galaxy was passing by us at speed, and half of it had passed already, then half the galaxy would be red-shifted and seem to spin very slowly, while the other half would be blue-shifted and seem to spin very swiftly?

What an odd sight that would be!
 
fbs7 said:
That's awesome... so if a galaxy was passing by us at speed, and half of it had passed already, then half the galaxy would be red-shifted and seem to spin very slowly, while the other half would be blue-shifted and seem to spin very swiftly?

What an odd sight that would be!
Not really, because it would happen so fast that you wouldn't actually see much spinning at all. Galaxies don't spin very fast.

Also, when we talk about something approaching us being blue shifted and immediately changing to being red shifted as it passes us, we mean it is directly in line with us. When it is off to the side, which I would hope a galaxy would be, the transistion is more gradual. Furthermore, when you're looking at a real three-dimensional object, you have to take into account the varying light transit times for every point that is a different distance away so it causes a lot of distortion in the visual image. It is very hard to calculate the precise image of a rapidly moving object, spinning or not.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top